Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dh02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 40B6338000090; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 11:01:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SJQwX-0004NR-6X for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 16:00:45 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SJQwW-0004NI-9Q for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 16:00:44 +0100 Received: from p3plsmtpa06-07.prod.phx3.secureserver.net ([173.201.192.108]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SJQwT-0006Cj-Vo for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 16:00:43 +0100 Received: (qmail 25334 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2012 15:00:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (71.197.41.115) by p3plsmtpa06-07.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (173.201.192.108) with ESMTP; 15 Apr 2012 15:00:30 -0000 Message-ID: <4F8AE28A.2040402@hifidelity.com> Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 15:00:26 +0000 From: Steve Dove User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.28) Gecko/20120306 Thunderbird/3.1.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <20120415104118.xw4cii7ibk00ow0o@webmail.senselan.ch> <1SJM8m-1vd6B80@fwd18.t-online.de> <20120415130746.69p0wok6oocw000w@webmail.senselan.ch> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Good find, Dave. Thanks! 73 Steve [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [173.201.192.108 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Scan-Signature: 5c1f37c04fc013ebbc2288fd3791d043 Subject: Re: LF: Titanic Frequency Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:484799904:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d41164f8ae2dd5493 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Good find, Dave. Thanks! 73 Steve On 4/15/2012 2:10 PM, DAVE PICK wrote: > According to all the information on the Marconi historical > sites it would have been 600m. > The installation on the Titanic could use LW (600m) or SW > (300m) bands but was set to 600m when it went down. > http://marconigraph.com/titanic/wireless/mgy_wireless.html > Dave G3YXM > > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 8.5.455 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/4337 - Release Date: 04/14/12 18:34:00 >