Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mg01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 0660538000096; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 17:57:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SJAwi-00011n-6B for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 22:55:52 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SJAwh-00011e-4v for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 22:55:51 +0100 Received: from out1.ip09ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.245]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SJAwe-0003mI-4t for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 22:55:49 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBAKnxiU9cGSan/2dsb2JhbAANNoJGtVUBAQEBA0keERELCQsECRYPCQMCAQIBRRMGAgEBwB2OJYMkBI4GiHiSDA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,423,1330905600"; d="scan'208,217";a="511769773" Received: from host-92-25-38-167.as13285.net (HELO [192.168.2.2]) ([92.25.38.167]) by out1.ip09ir2.opaltelecom.net with ESMTP; 14 Apr 2012 22:55:45 +0100 Message-ID: <4F89F260.4080307@talktalk.net> Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 22:55:44 +0100 From: qrss User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <6ef06c9b13fe46a69769684fb8dbd5fb@kabelmail.de> In-Reply-To: <6ef06c9b13fe46a69769684fb8dbd5fb@kabelmail.de> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Uwe Just a thought about phase jitter as an explanation for the fairly wide traces, Actually the 47uHz result now is quite good, previously it seemed that the longer periods were producing poorer results, it is most likely just noise at this DX distance. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.24.128.245 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 6bb858db23df2b82c4f5a8cb512b45b1 Subject: Re: LF: 8970.022Hz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030105060602090107090709" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:506089248:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60c94f89f2ca4432 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030105060602090107090709 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Uwe Just a thought about phase jitter as an explanation for the fairly wide traces, Actually the 47uHz result now is quite good, previously it seemed that the longer periods were producing poorer results, it is most likely just noise at this DX distance. Thanks for the signal, it's really nice to see you again. Hope the XYL is safe in the garden. 73 Eddie On 14/04/2012 21:21, uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de wrote: > > *Hi Eddie,* > > ** > > ** > > *thanks fort the report.* > > ** > > *if you see phase jitter pse send me a pic showing it.* > > *here in the near field I see a clean carrier.* > > ** > > *GL* > > *Uwe/dj8wx/jo43sv* > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Gesendet: 14.04.2012 11:48 > An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Betreff: Re: LF: 8970.022Hz > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Hello Uwe > > Your signal is not as strong as in the past, best viewed here in > 238uHz. Do you have some phase jitter? > > 73 Eddie > > http://g3zjo.bplaced.net/ > > On 13/04/2012 21:11, uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de wrote: >> *Hi all, >> >> the TX has been switched on at 1955GMT an will be on the air at least >> until tomorrow 2000GMT.* * >> >> GL* * >> Uwe/dj8wx/jo43sv* > > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 2012.0.2127 / Virus Database: 2411/4936 - Release Date: 04/14/12 > --------------030105060602090107090709 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Uwe

Just a thought about phase jitter as an explanation for the fairly wide traces, Actually the 47uHz result now is quite good, previously it seemed that the longer periods were producing poorer results, it is most likely just noise at this DX distance.

Thanks for the signal, it's really nice to see you again. Hope the XYL is safe in the garden.

73 Eddie

On 14/04/2012 21:21, uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de wrote:

Hi Eddie,

 

 

thanks fort the report.

 

if you see phase jitter pse send me a pic showing it.

here in the near field I see a clean carrier.

 

GL

Uwe/dj8wx/jo43sv



Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Gesendet: 14.04.2012 11:48
An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Betreff: Re: LF: 8970.022Hz


Hello Uwe

Your signal is not as strong as in the past, best viewed here in 238uHz. Do you have some phase jitter?

73 Eddie

http://g3zjo.bplaced.net/

On 13/04/2012 21:11, uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de wrote:
Hi all,

the TX has been switched on at 1955GMT an will be on the air at least until tomorrow 2000GMT.


GL

Uwe/dj8wx/jo43sv

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2127 / Virus Database: 2411/4936 - Release Date: 04/14/12


--------------030105060602090107090709--