Message-ID: <4F813C2D.3010500@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2012 09:20:13 +0200
From: =?UTF-8?B?U3RlZmFuIFNjaMOkZmVy?= <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <4F803F91.80007@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <1333806691.2036.3.camel@gerhard-desktop-acer>
In-Reply-To: <1333806691.2036.3.camel@gerhard-desktop-acer>
Subject: Re: VLF: Local VLF tests...
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0  
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60564f813c8b5168
X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25
X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none


Hi Gerhard,

Yes, of course. I just meant the "official" researchers who do that work 
as their job to earn money and (have to) publish their work on 
conferences and in various papers. For them it is important to be "the 
first" one who describes a phenomen. We are in the situation to do what 
we want to do, just for fun and extremely relaxed :-) If our work is 
"new" then it is fine and if it is "re-inventing the wheel" then it is 
fine too :-)

73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am 07.04.2012 15:51, schrieb Gerhard Hickl:
> Stefan !
>
> I think WE ARE researchers in some way. Maybe not all of us do have the
> theoretical background which is "necessary" do to "real" research
> (whatever that means) but sometimes I think this could be an advantage.
>
> 73
> OE3GHB
> Gerhard
>
>