Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-md03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 71F5D38000088; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 05:54:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SJM92-0003h3-9M for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 10:53:20 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SJM91-0003gm-Ts for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 10:53:19 +0100 Received: from mailout05.t-online.de ([194.25.134.82]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SJM90-0005h2-3V for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 10:53:18 +0100 Received: from fwd18.aul.t-online.de (fwd18.aul.t-online.de ) by mailout05.t-online.de with smtp id 1SJM8y-0004r2-UB; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 11:53:16 +0200 Received: from [192.168.2.32] (X7c0dBZ1gh1ZoAn+w7u3LQdNN7jA0Mivz2NIB+sLTDB3iOjc1iCm41i7cwz+o80QjB@[91.57.81.18]) by fwd18.t-online.de with esmtp id 1SJM8m-1vd6B80; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 11:53:04 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: hajo.brandt.dj1zb@t-online.de References:<20120415104118.xw4cii7ibk00ow0o@webmail.senselan.ch> In-Reply-To:<20120415104118.xw4cii7ibk00ow0o@webmail.senselan.ch> To: X-Mailer: T-Online eMail 6.08.0003 Date: 15 Apr 2012 09:48 GMT Message-ID: <1SJM8m-1vd6B80@fwd18.t-online.de> X-ID: X7c0dBZ1gh1ZoAn+w7u3LQdNN7jA0Mivz2NIB+sLTDB3iOjc1iCm41i7cwz+o80QjB X-TOI-MSGID: 18d7f188-996f-41b2-b6d3-1c90be0e62cc X-RFC2822-Warning: Obsolete format in Date: header X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: According to the state of the art at that time the Titanic had used a spark transmitter, emitting a frecuency band of at least 100 kHz! schrieb: > Does anybody know, on which frequency the titanic sent the SOS? Was it really > 500kc/s? > 73 de Toni, HB9ASB > 73 Ha-Jo, DJ1ZB [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [194.25.134.82 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines X-Scan-Signature: e4383209d2ccb9552700d53c0b540538 Subject: Re: LF: Titanic Frequency Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:303649440:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60574f8a9ac044a0 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none According to the state of the art at that time the Titanic had used a spark transmitter, emitting a frecuency band of at least 100 kHz! schrieb: > Does anybody know, on which frequency the titanic sent the SOS? Was it really > 500kc/s? > 73 de Toni, HB9ASB > 73 Ha-Jo, DJ1ZB