Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-df03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 93E6438000084; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 07:52:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SOSeY-0006Ke-04 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 12:50:58 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SOSeX-0006KV-H8 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 12:50:57 +0100 Received: from nm19.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([77.238.189.76]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SOSeV-0006bw-0L for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2012 12:50:56 +0100 Received: from [77.238.189.232] by nm19.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 29 Apr 2012 11:50:53 -0000 Received: from [212.82.108.226] by tm13.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 29 Apr 2012 11:50:53 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1003.bt.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 29 Apr 2012 11:50:53 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 518084.47541.bm@omp1003.bt.mail.ird.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 40390 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2012 11:50:53 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:From:To:References:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:In-Reply-To:Thread-Index; b=bK2p2xH7EP4YBUxLYu8Pvqhs/dZzi7PmgD6Jx+xKV1fCLI4mDoHvkM8z0z6G/pUooeJhZKvizRCzk2KeTPFJbkERCiOz+0YwGJFItEV7j8ISp2tUJ7Lzph9xhtBAhlzgSDzL4X6bfGtnw+X03siya1F3l6wEo2VYpAf8JKVLsao= ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1335700253; bh=6hUfmiQAgd1f3CORkVdoDsvAQSR3nCcYyPzkOr5CYR0=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:From:To:References:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:In-Reply-To:Thread-Index; b=Chq7thQwZ1kPABfsd/mtWT5UzcqiNymFZa/KXu45mdi8VaTaTKBOr79pQI0mi1pVqrSgaK2wRqVyg5JKBuJARJMvfm3chFSC+zmgP7oa/8UsZ1qaJXgq1roTcCxVOWgoDbJAQ5eVvzJ73Oxo8j/Aq3iB0Z6Nr+eHuElvIRAgkO4= X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: 6xi9mQYVM1lwDzZ1ApP0YaMTHiX5inRv_VbI7V.SlDUdncv 2NoIdY5oYdC0_h.VDpPSs.qzJUgGJaUGaYVus75_pFvM5lcvAIgxAWdPV88N 9vXrLhq.UCHJSRedxIanJBQjIJFfAgsOaujkn9A44jV3uYUGbk5Jib87Cted wED0Uin_vOv86th8aCFPugi_uNElHPRMNLxGQGNZCltisYcNnHYsPuE5CXd0 CLrOez55dYZ8Odgzu3mWmahJkJLnAU1n0V2N1giH1.eJ4hq7p57x_eQ9SEJG HA7qfRvIrradDUVtrpRa9oD7cciI7u7_O25frSAF5mLSSXIlipSoa5ssRfZG ut.pnXf.c2VvSAy8QrDW8KtyhcVP1ixjDBkQL_Y6DQWbHN9xPYukGX2XgCCt uYT7pv0P3767lsBeQMHAvCN0- X-Yahoo-SMTP: 9Y6mUHuswBAgnrOsukIiNdFDf95uy_Dz34nY1hlg2liKgYD952sjbg-- Received: from lindavideo (ken.h.wright@86.149.193.253 with login) by smtp818.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Apr 2012 11:50:53 +0000 GMT From: "Ken" To: References: <28E264A70BC6433AB06D915D0EAFB8B9@AGB> <2BB37ECFB44044EFACB44777CD3A2963@AGB> Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2012 12:50:52 +0100 Message-ID: <1C53C5D0C2994BE792CED0AD217ADB76@lindavideo> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 In-Reply-To: <2BB37ECFB44044EFACB44777CD3A2963@AGB> Thread-Index: Ac0l7dG+AColHaKcTfSZO9WTLpGaiQADvN8g X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Graham. Can you remember the name of the web site where the layout was?, I did my own layout but it was not all that successful when tested on 198kHz S/N improved but no increase in level, although this may have been because I wound two 20mH inductors for the power feed and may have been too greater inter-winding capacitance, for use on VLF. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [77.238.189.76 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 66d07794ca19cd68f7d6cc289cd4ac18 Subject: RE: LF: BFQ19 SMT Collector pad Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:456444224:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m213.1 ; domain : btinternet.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40d74f9d2b6b3fb7 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hello Graham. Can you remember the name of the web site where the layout was?, I did my own layout but it was not all that successful when tested on 198kHz S/N improved but no increase in level, although this may have been because I wound two 20mH inductors for the power feed and may have been too greater inter-winding capacitance, for use on VLF. 73s Ken M0KHW IO91TV -----Original Message----- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Graham Sent: 29 April 2012 10:52 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: BFQ19 SMT Collector pad Ok , Tnx , Roelof, I thought that may be the case, but before doing it , best to ask ... I have a pcb layout (from web) for a mini-whip Ae and after your post , that the bfq19 is a better option, was going to alter the track to take the surface mount device, would need to be on the track side of the board. At 1.5 mm pitch will not be that simple ! Q there a commercial PCB available ? 73 -G. -------------------------------------------------- From: "Roelof Bakker" Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2012 10:35 AM To: Subject: Re: LF: BFQ19 SMT Collector pad > Hello Graham, > > I use them a lot and yes, you can solder the collector tap, which is > preferred for better heat transfer. > For best contact, I solder both sides of the collector. > > 73, > Roelof, pa0rdt >