Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-da01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id A115B380000AC; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:33:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SCzGE-0006mq-H1 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 21:14:26 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SCzGD-0006mY-Hi for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 21:14:25 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1SCzGB-0007jM-SS for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 21:14:25 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q2SKENtY016195 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 22:14:23 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q2SKEM2E004824 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 22:14:22 +0200 Message-ID: <4F737105.6040609@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 22:13:57 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?U3RlZmFuIFNjaMOkZmVy?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <8CEDA76E04F70F0-1B04-5AAF@webmail-d082.sysops.aol.com> <1332956278.2450.15.camel@gerhard-desktop-acer> <4F7350EA.6080602@freenet.de> In-Reply-To: <4F7350EA.6080602@freenet.de> X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: VLF: DF6NM on 8970.002 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:480892576:93952408 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40494f73758122d1 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Wolf, your last mail came through! So it must be local QRM ;-) 73, Stefan Am 28.03.2012 19:56, schrieb wolf_dl4yhf: > Hello Gerhard, Markus, and the group, > > This is most likely old hat, and been tried before, but maybe... > > Below a certain current density, the discharge into air may be "dark" > but still dark enough to produce heat, or even chemical reacions > (think about how ozone is produced: a discharge with very low current > density). > I recently visited the local garden store, and those nice giant hollow > polished steel spheres caught my eye. May be worth to use two of them > as the 'end caps' of the wire antenna, to reduce the field strength at > the end of the wires ? These spheres are very light-weight due to > their thin walls, only a few hundred grams even for the monster-sized > ones. > > All the best, > Wolf . > > > > Am 28.03.2012 19:37, schrieb Gerhard Hickl: >> Hello Markus, VLF! >> >> This might be true at least partially. In my setup, I'm observing >> acoustic noise without the presence of corona discharges. I observed my >> antenna in the dark, running about 600mA of antenna current. There was >> no "corona" visible but the noise was clearly heard. Definitely it was >> not emitted by the loading coil behind the house but I have got the >> impression, that it was emitted by the ends of the top-load wires. One >> of those ends is even 50m away from the coil, in my neighbours garden. >> When walking from my property (where I also have an end of a top-load >> wire) up to his plot of land, the noise is decreasing and then getting >> louder again under the end of the wire on his property. >> >> In this respect I agree with you. The sound is emitted by the ends of >> the top-load wires but it doesn't need a corona-discharge to make the >> antenna "noisy" during transmit. >> >> In fact, this behaviour of my antenna is the biggest problem in >> transmitting during warm summer (spring) days. My neighbour allowed me >> to use one of his trees as a hook of the top-load so I can't bother him >> with noise when he's out in the garden.....that's way more than good >> neighbourhood could bear. >> >> The more I would be interested in suppressing this noise by suitable >> measures. >> >> 73 >> OE3GHB >> Gerhard >> >> >> >> >> Am Dienstag, den 27.03.2012, 17:22 -0400 schrieb Markus Vester: >>> It's a beautiful night! At 20:25, I have started up a straight carrier >>> on 8970.002 Hz (DHO locked). If all stays well I will leave it on >>> until after sunrise. >>> >>> An interesting observation on the side: In the first few minutes, I >>> drove the amp up to 400 mA antenna current. A little corona became >>> visible near the ends of two of the three topload wires - it wasn't >>> very bright, not unlike 3rd magnitude stars when viewed from the >>> ground 10 m below. But the 9 kHz sound from antenna itself could be >>> heard quite loudly, which is a potential cause for neighbourhood >>> trouble. >>> >>> Then I reduced the drive to 350 mA where the corona disappeared >>> completely. So did the noise, the antenna became absolutely quiet! All >>> that was left was a little noise from the coil in the dustbin on the >>> balcony, and the transformer indoors. Thus the predominant cause for a >>> squeaking antenna must be corona. The fact that it can be heard at 9 >>> rather than 18 kHz demonstrates that the discharge must have an >>> asymmetric dependence on the voltage polarity. >>> >>> At the same time, wideband electrical noise on the nearby LF grabber >>> antenna went down by 20 dB. >>> >>> BTW If you like you can actually read my VLF frequency from an alias >>> line on the LF TA grabber: It is created by the 24th VLF harmonic, >>> intermodulating with DCF 77, thus appearing on 24 x 8970.002 - 77500 = >>> 137780.048 Hz. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Markus (DF6NM) >> >> >> >> >