Message-ID: <4F720A80.4000401@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 20:44:16 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <E3C9988CF5444EE3BFA323F7C9F71CA5@acer> <4F71F6F9.7060104@dsl.pipex.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F71F6F9.7060104@dsl.pipex.com>
Subject: Re: VLF: 8970Hz and 8970.022
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------000502060808080904010700"
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0  
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1db4054f720ae17382
X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25
X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------000502060808080904010700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Henny, Chris, VLF

Am 27.03.2012 19:20, schrieb Chris Dillon:
> [...]
>
> Henny - your signal is stronger with me now - putting the coil outside 
> seems to be working.

Yes, here too. I wasn't sure if i actually saw your signal Henny. But 
now it becomes more probably.
There are propagation effects on our 397 km distance, diurnal QSB. I 
lost your trace at arround 12 UTC. It was visible in 424 uHz. A 
frequency shift of some few mHz would really help to identify your 
signal. But you would have to use SpecLab for that and use a locked 
sampling rate for this. It can be done by using a small ferrite antenna, 
resonated to GQD. If you use an audio amplifier it would be an easy 
procedure.

450 mA. Where do you measure this current? In the cold end of the coil 
or outside the house? I remember you have had 450 mA for a longer time 
now but its the first time we can see your signal so well. Maybe a 
significant part of that current was flowing back to earth before 
passing the radiation resistance. Then, the actual antenna current is 
_now_ 450 mA while it was say 200 mA where the coil was inside.
How much L did you have to add to come to resonance again, when the coil 
was placed outside?

73, Stefan/DK7FC

--------------000502060808080904010700
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
  <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
 http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Hi Henny, Chris, VLF<br>
<br>
Am 27.03.2012 19:20, schrieb Chris Dillon:
<blockquote cite="mid:4F71F6F9.7060104@dsl.pipex.com" type="cite">[...]<br>
  <br>
Henny - your signal is stronger with me now - putting the coil outside
seems to be working.
  <br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Yes, here too. I wasn't sure if i actually saw your signal Henny. But
now it becomes more probably.<br>
There are propagation effects on our 397 km distance, diurnal QSB. I
lost your trace at arround 12 UTC. It was visible in 424 uHz. A
frequency shift of some few mHz would really help to identify your
signal. But you would have to use SpecLab for that and use a locked
sampling rate for this. It can be done by using a small ferrite
antenna, resonated to GQD. If you use an audio amplifier it would be an
easy procedure.<br>
<br>
450 mA. Where do you measure this current? In the cold end of the coil
or outside the house? I remember you have had 450 mA for a longer time
now but its the first time we can see your signal so well. Maybe a
significant part of that current was flowing back to earth before
passing the radiation resistance. Then, the actual antenna current is <u>now</u>
450 mA while it was say 200 mA where the coil was inside.<br>
How much L did you have to add to come to resonance again, when the
coil was placed outside?<br>
<br>
73, Stefan/DK7FC<br>
</body>
</html>

--------------000502060808080904010700--