Message-ID: <4F6B87B9.6030103@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 21:12:41 +0100
From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: LF: JA8SCD
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0  
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40494f6b882267a2
X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25
X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none


LF,

I just got a hint from Yas/JA8SCD who informed me that DCF39 is very 
strong today, i.e. right now, in Japan. He also mentioned some very 
faint traces on his grabber at http://icas.to/argo/eu.htm So i took the 
time a stared on the spectrogram and tried to find if there are some 
conspicuous pixels. Without knowing which character i was actually 
transmitting to that time i decided that these few pixels arround 19:25 
UTC could be a K. Then i took a look on my grabber, and behold, there 
was a K to that time.

What do others think about that? I don't want to call it a detection as 
long as others do not confirm that. It's to faint that trace. I need 
other opinions. Don't want to play a lonely game which others interprete 
as pure imagination ;-) There are captures which are very clear although 
faint. This one is closer to imagination, the absolute limit ;-)  If  
someone want to see the image but is to late to see it on the grabber, 
here it is: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/172tg.jpg

Thanks to Yas for the grabber and exciting chance.

Vy 73, Stefan/DK7FC