Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mc01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id AFEF33800008B; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 07:05:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Ry04D-0000Mj-OV for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:04:05 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Ry04D-0000Ma-6I for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:04:05 +0000 Received: from smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl ([194.109.24.24]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Ry04B-0003dC-QQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:04:05 +0000 Received: from pc-roelof (ndb.demon.nl [82.161.81.65]) by smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q1GC3vrn021772 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:04:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from roelof@ndb.demon.nl) To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <6C05E5021A484E229E4D20124C3D4AA9@TraceyPC> <002d01cceb30$87c42cc0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <4F3A8898.40302@xs4all.nl> <7E7DFBB4D102A04DB5ADC88D66628A4A015771@ICTS-S-MBX5.luna.kuleuven.be> <002801ccec2a$6b148430$1502a8c0@Clemens04> <002201ccec36$0387c3c0$1502a8c0@Clemens04> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 13:03:51 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Roelof Bakker" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <002201ccec36$0387c3c0$1502a8c0@Clemens04> User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.61 (Win32) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes Subject: Re: LF: Re: WRC-12 Approves the New 472-479 kHz Amateur Radio Allocation Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:315252064:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60494f3cf1014d7c X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hello all, I believe it is time to put things into the right perspective. Technically speaking, NDB's are obsolete. However in practice, they are not. NDB's are in widely use in the offshore industry for guiding helicopters to offshore installations and special purpose offshore vessels. New work ships build today and equipped with a heli-deck carry also a NDB. When America is not your best friend, it seems sensible that for aeronautical direction finding, you won't rely on the US GPS system. NDB's are very reliable and cheap to maintain and not easily wiped out all together, so the system has good redundancy. For that reason it can be understood why some countries ask for some protection for this service. Regarding the NIB issue, the EIRP of most NDB's is in the same class as the EIRP of the amateur license for 472-479 kHz. The NDB band covers 190 kHz to 1740 kHz and that includes the MW broadcast band. Many Russian NDB's transmit in the range 530 - 1250 kHz and though many powerful broadcast stations reside in the same frequency range, this does not seem to pose a problem. The requirements for the service area of a NDB is a fieldstrength of 70 uV/m at the borderline. So to cause noticeable interference, the offending signal must be rather strong. Many NDB's share the same channel, apparently without problems. Unless you actually live in or near the service area of a NDB in the 472-479 kHz frequency range, the NIB regulations won't pose a problem. It is also interesting to note that quite a few offshore NDB's in the Norwegian part of the North Sea operate between 530 and 600 kHz. So this NIB requirement won't spoil he fun! 73, Roelof Bakker, pa0rdt