Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of andy.g4jnt@gmail.com designates 10.42.174.8 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.42.174.8;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4F4C793C.25633.1363DE@dave.davesergeant.com>
References: <74845C11BC3444D79B63A207E428BDE0@lindavideo>
	<005701ccf561$cd9d4250$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
	<098856018E3A46AB96BA9F9FC6C8FFCD@JimPC>
	<4F4C793C.25633.1363DE@dave.davesergeant.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:10:04 +0000
Message-ID: <CAA8k23TU1321FRDyvbdVMKY+pGdrchiAhPpZ43cZPTon-kOmyw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Andy Talbot <andy.g4jnt@gmail.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: Re: NDBs & WRC-12 LF band allocation
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba6135163f2c8404ba036e85
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0  
X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d258.2 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : pass  
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1db40a4f4ca8344850
X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25
X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none


--90e6ba6135163f2c8404ba036e85
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

That''s OK Dave, if Mal's opinion won the day, then this amateur would
never use the band.  I will not use Morse.  I intensely dislike it   So one
way or the other one of us would populate the frequency.

However, more than likely commone sense will prevail, as it always seems to
in the Am bands and operating in this country,

'jnt



On 28 February 2012 06:50, Dave Sergeant <dave@davesergeant.com> wrote:

> If such a rule built into the permits for this band then this amateur
> for one will never consider using it.
>
> 73 Dave G3YMC
>
> On 28 Feb 2012 at 0:02, James Moritz wrote:
>
> > So there is
> > a strong argument for amateurs not to use morse code at all in this
> > frequency range. It would be better to use totally different types of
> > transmission that would not be confused with a NDB beacon signal.
> >
>
>
> http://www.davesergeant.com
>
>
>

--90e6ba6135163f2c8404ba036e85
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div>That&#39;&#39;s OK Dave, if Mal&#39;s opinion won the day, then this a=
mateur would never use the band.=A0 I will not use Morse.=A0 I intensely di=
slike it=A0=A0 So one way or the other one of us would populate the frequen=
cy.=A0 </div>

<div>=A0</div>
<div>However, more than likely commone sense will prevail, as it always see=
ms to in the Am bands and operating in this country,</div>
<div>=A0</div>
<div>&#39;jnt</div>
<div><br><br>=A0</div>
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On 28 February 2012 06:50, Dave Sergeant <span d=
ir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:dave@davesergeant.com">dave@davesergeant.c=
om</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote style=3D"BORDER-LEFT:#ccc 1px solid;MARGIN:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;PA=
DDING-LEFT:1ex" class=3D"gmail_quote">If such a rule built into the permits=
 for this band then this amateur<br>for one will never consider using it.<b=
r>
<br>73 Dave G3YMC<br>
<div class=3D"im"><br>On 28 Feb 2012 at 0:02, James Moritz wrote:<br><br>&g=
t; So there is<br>&gt; a strong argument for amateurs not to use morse code=
 at all in this<br>&gt; frequency range. It would be better to use totally =
different types of<br>
&gt; transmission that would not be confused with a NDB beacon signal.<br>&=
gt;<br><br><br></div><a href=3D"http://www.davesergeant.com/" target=3D"_bl=
ank">http://www.davesergeant.com</a><br><br><br></blockquote></div><br><spa=
n style=3D"WIDTH:0px;HEIGHT:0px" title=3D"bandoo.xml_contener"></span>

--90e6ba6135163f2c8404ba036e85--