Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-me02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 0B433380000DD; Thu, 2 Feb 2012 20:41:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Rt88P-0004xy-EJ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 01:40:17 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Rt88O-0004xp-QK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 01:40:16 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Rt88N-0001Sp-Ky for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 01:40:16 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q131eEkq011928 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 02:40:15 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q131eE1n008624 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 02:40:14 +0100 Message-ID: <4F2B3AE1.3010308@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 02:39:45 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4F2B0FC1.4020408@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4F2B17BB.2030007@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: tonight Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060105020501090802070806" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:468758528:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d608a4f2b3b323f72 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060105020501090802070806 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id q131eEkq011928 Hi Doug, I have to smile. It's actually an exciting night. There is stronger QSB but nice signal levels between that. Also=20 Mike/G3XDV is transmitting and well above the noise. I just saw him on=20 the VE1VDM grabber. Vernon reported i am audible in Nova Scotia, so that's OK ;-) The farer to the west, the closer comes the path to the auroral oval=20 where a lot seems to go on these days. But the signal made it to UA0SNV=20 again, just got that screenshot from Vasily:=20 http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/capt2229.PNG It's one step to JA7NI from there and it is a very good indicator for=20 possible DX... 73, GL, Stefan PS: I switched to DFCW-90 a while ago. Your settings are fine. 90 dot=20 normal would be an alternative. Am 03.02.2012 01:20, schrieb Douglas D. Williams: > Switched to QRSS60 (slow). > D. > > On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Douglas D. Williams > wrote: > > Getting traces of one (perhaps two) signals..... > 700Hz =3D 136.172kHz > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/33457409/cap00000.jpg > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/33457409/cap00001.jpg > D. KB4OER > > > 2012/2/2 Stefan Sch=E4fer > > > > Am 02.02.2012 23:48, schrieb Douglas D. Williams: > > So, 136.172kHz....QRSS 30 second slow? > I'll be watching. > That gives me an entire 6Hz of bandwidth in my ARGO > window, centered on 136.172kHz. > D. KB4OER > > > > No, QRSS-60. I could also switch to DFCW-90 which may be a bit > more efficient. > > Look at UA0SNV, propagation seems to be better than i expected > :-) http://dl.dropbox.com/u/47550836/UA0SNV_LF_Grabber.html > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > > --------------060105020501090802070806 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Doug,

I have to smile. It's actually an exciting night.
There is stronger QSB but nice signal levels between that. Also Mike/G3XDV is transmitting and well above the noise. I just saw him on the VE1VDM grabber.
Vernon reported i am audible in Nova Scotia, so that's OK ;-)
The farer to the west, the closer comes the path to the auroral oval where a lot seems to go on these days. But the signal made it to UA0SNV again, just got that screenshot from Vasily: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/capt2229.PNG
It's one step to JA7NI from there and it is a very good indicator for possible DX...

73, GL, Stefan

PS: I switched to DFCW-90 a while ago. Your settings are fine. 90 dot normal would be an alternative.


Am 03.02.2012 01:20, schrieb Douglas D. Williams:
Switched to QRSS60 (slow).
 
D.

On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Douglas D. Williams <kb4oer@gmail.com> wrote:
Getting traces of one (perhaps two) signals.....
 
700Hz = 136.172kHz
 
 
 
 
 
 
D. KB4OER
 


 
2012/2/2 Stefan Schäfer <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>

Am 02.02.2012 23:48, schrieb Douglas D. Williams:

So, 136.172kHz....QRSS 30 second slow?
I'll be watching.
That gives me an entire 6Hz of bandwidth in my ARGO window, centered on 136.172kHz.
D. KB4OER



No, QRSS-60. I could also switch to DFCW-90 which may be a bit more efficient.

Look at UA0SNV, propagation seems to be better than i expected :-) http://dl.dropbox.com/u/47550836/UA0SNV_LF_Grabber.html

73, Stefan/DK7FC



--------------060105020501090802070806--