Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-df01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id D0774380000AA; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 13:32:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1RseyQ-0002vU-4p for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:32:02 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1RseyP-0002vL-8J for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:32:01 +0000 Received: from cmsout02.mbox.net ([165.212.64.32]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1RseyN-0004O9-J4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:32:01 +0000 Received: from cmsout02.mbox.net (co02-lo [127.0.0.1]) by cmsout02.mbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FE141348C2 for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 18:31:52 +0000 (GMT) X-USANET-Received: from cmsout02.mbox.net [127.0.0.1] by cmsout02.mbox.net via mtad (C8.MAIN.3.72B) with ESMTP id 536qBasfx9856M02; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:31:49 -0000 X-USANET-Routed: 3 gwsout-vs Q:bmvirus Received: from cmsapps02.cms.usa.net [165.212.11.138] by cmsout02.mbox.net via smtad (C8.MAIN.3.72B) with ESMTP id XID559qBasfx0466X02; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:31:49 -0000 X-USANET-Source: 165.212.11.138 IN dibene@usa.net cmsapps02.cms.usa.net X-USANET-MsgId: XID559qBasfx0466X02 Received: from [127.0.0.1] [151.55.7.222] by cmsapps02.cms.usa.net (ESMTPSA/dibene@usa.net) via mtad (C8.MAIN.3.72B) with ESMTPSA id 340qBasfW6368M38; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:31:48 -0000 X-USANET-Auth: 151.55.7.222 AUTH dibene@usa.net [127.0.0.1] Message-ID: <4F298512.1010305@usa.net> Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:31:46 +0100 From: Alberto di Bene User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4F286089.000027.05504@BOB-PC> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 120201-0, 02/01/2012), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Z-USANET-MsgId: XID340qBasfx6368X38 X-Spam-Score: 2.3 (++) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=0.64,HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_02=0.192,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Converting antenna Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060405040606010008090800" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.7 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_IMAGE_AREA_07, HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_04,HTML_MESSAGE,RISK_FREE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 1:2:447824096:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 2 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40d54f29855859ef X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060405040606010008090800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2/1/2012 12:35 AM, James Moritz wrote: > I guess as far as LF frequencies are concerned, the Butternut antenna is > just a 10m vertical whip (provided you disconnect the coil across the feed > point - otherwise it will be nearly a short circuited whip...). This will > give you plenty of signal, provided the antenna is reasonably matched to the > RX input. Matching requires tuning it to resonance. The simplest form of > tuner is just an inductor connected between the feed point of the antenna > and the low impedance RX input Jim and the group, I used with good results the following schematic to match a random piece of wire to an LF Rx. Below also the Spice simulation. Gain is high, and is given only by the passive impedance step-up, so there are no risks of distortion, as long as the Rx does not saturate... C1 is absolutely not critical, can range from 1nF to 4.7nF with no practical changes in the performance of the circuit. 73 Alberto I2PHD http://dl.dropbox.com/u/15089947/LFmatchSch.gif http://dl.dropbox.com/u/15089947/LFmatchGain.gif --------------060405040606010008090800 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2/1/2012 12:35 AM, James Moritz wrote:
I guess as far as LF frequencies are concerned, the =
Butternut antenna is=20
just a 10m vertical whip (provided you disconnect the coil across the fee=
d=20
point - otherwise it will be nearly a short circuited whip...). This will=
=20
give you plenty of signal, provided the antenna is reasonably matched to =
the=20
RX input. Matching requires tuning it to resonance. The simplest form of=20
tuner is just an inductor connected between the feed point of the antenna=
=20
and the low impedance RX input
Jim and the group,

=A0 I used with good results the following schematic to match a random piece of wire
to an LF Rx.=A0 Below also the Spice simulation. Gain is high, and is given only by the
passive impedance step-up, so there are no risks of distortion, as long as the Rx
does not saturate...

C1 is absolutely not critical, can range from 1nF to 4.7nF with no practical changes
in the performance of the circuit.

73=A0 Alberto=A0 I2PHD

3D"http://dl.dropbox.com/u/15089947/LFmatchSch.gif"

3D"http://dl.dropbox.com/u/15089947/LFmatchGain.gif"


--------------060405040606010008090800--