Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dg06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 3DD6D3800008A; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 09:32:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Rsap3-0001P8-G0 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:06:05 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Rsap3-0001Oz-29 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:06:05 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Rsap2-0002Jh-8I for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:06:05 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q11E63H5000369 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 15:06:03 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q11E63Uj004415 for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 15:06:03 +0100 Message-ID: <4F2946AE.6040205@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 15:05:34 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <000001cce062$f75dfad0$e619f070$@broadpark.no> <8CEAED202205706-C78-2162B@webmail-stg-m04.sysops.aol.com> <4F2929BD.4070308@charter.net> In-Reply-To: <4F2929BD.4070308@charter.net> X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Wolf 137.294 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:360357696:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d410e4f294ce76aea X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Congrats, to John and Markus! John, if you use the WOLF gui program, there is a box in the "special" register card which shows the time in each row when enabled. If this would be enabled, we would have easier going to seach on some grabber screenshots for a signal like mine to compare with. If you run the RX in WOLF and SL to the same time and collect screen grabs, you could even do it for yourselfe. Just an idea.. Yesterday i decided to build a quick class-AB "linear" mode PA to drive the LOPT for a local test which i will do in some hours. My first test to propagate and receive a WOLF 10 VLF signal over a distance of 950m, http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/VLF/WOLF%20VLF%201st%20test.png 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 01.02.2012 13:02, schrieb John Andrews: > Markus, > > In what must have been a cruel trick by the gods of propagation, your > signal was sent to me, bypassing the QTH's of W1VD and VE2IQ. > > 2012-02-01 03:46:40 >WOLF10 -r 8001.056 -f 800.518 -t 0.5 -d 24 -w > 0.0000 > t: 24 f: 0.195 a:-0.9 dp: 83.6 ci: 4 cj:200 F6JT8M1UR4I*/F ? > t: 48 f: 0.334 a: 1.1 dp: 89.3 ci:15 cj: 42 OQQEGQ0VLM1HBC/ ? > t: 96 f: 0.336 a: 0.9 dp: 88.0 ci: 5 cj:432 NXPW1Y.9K8WOT8N ? > snip... > t: 864 f:-0.078 pm:38.87 jm:461 q: -4.9 -7.6 E6SPZNVR3I.G0H ? > t: 960 f:-0.078 pm:47.17 jm:461 q: -4.5 -8.8 BNWV.AG/YG17PCM ? > t:1056 f:-0.078 pm:52.28 jm:461 q: -4.0 -8.8 73 DF6NM JN593 ? > t:1152 f:-0.078 pm:55.71 jm:461 q: -3.7 -9.3 Y6P.3IC/7H2DN7W ? > t:1248 f:-0.078 pm:56.51 jm:461 q: -3.5 -8.1 JTNBM8JRZNH.SG2 ? > t:1344 f:-0.078 pm:57.02 jm:461 q: -3.5 -5.7 73 DF6NM JN59NJ - > t:1440 f:-0.078 pm:59.84 jm:461 q: -3.0 -5.0 73 DF6NM JN59NJ - > t:1536 f:-0.078 pm:62.04 jm:461 q: -2.8 -4.8 73 DF6NM JN59NJ - > t:1632 f:-0.078 pm:66.65 jm:461 q: -2.4 -5.1 73 DF6NM JN59NJ - > t:1728 f:-0.078 pm:67.49 jm:461 q: -2.3 -5.7 73 DF6NM JN59NJ - > t:1824 f:-0.078 pm:68.50 jm:461 q: -2.2 -5.5 73 DF6NM JN59NJ - > t:1920 f: 0.166 pm:72.00 jm:635 q: -6.4 -8.0 JYJ21IJWVG7CCF ? > > I'm betting that the peak was strong, but fairly brief, and the > "flywheel effect" stretched it out. I don't know what Stephan's signal > was doing at the time. > > Anyway, it worked! > > John, W1TAG > FN42ch