Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dh03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 4F4AD38000086; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 11:03:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1S1K4y-0002NJ-Ic for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 16:02:36 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1S1K4y-0002NA-7N for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 16:02:36 +0000 Received: from mailout11.t-online.de ([194.25.134.85]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1S1K4w-0003pg-Rz for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 16:02:36 +0000 Received: from fwd01.aul.t-online.de (fwd01.aul.t-online.de ) by mailout11.t-online.de with smtp id 1S1K4v-0003V0-MK; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 17:02:33 +0100 Received: from [192.168.2.32] (X7AZd6ZfohGDIplV4u7Ok3uDCg1GWK790OCv7USw16+R4dAUJLvzftQRzzPpdVhQNG@[79.237.175.181]) by fwd01.t-online.de with esmtp id 1S1K4o-0OzWam0; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 17:02:26 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: hajo.brandt.dj1zb@t-online.de References:<004a01ccf317$38d48170$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <6C0C76B97330431C8D2C9F94BDD77757@GaryPC> In-Reply-To: To: X-Mailer: T-Online eMail 6.08.0003 Date: 25 Feb 2012 16:02 GMT Message-ID: <1S1K4o-0OzWam0@fwd01.t-online.de> X-ID: X7AZd6ZfohGDIplV4u7Ok3uDCg1GWK790OCv7USw16+R4dAUJLvzftQRzzPpdVhQNG X-TOI-MSGID: 4e6f9e06-fddd-4981-825a-07b69b138217 X-Spam-Score: 1.8 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,NO_REAL_NAME=0.55,RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=1.236,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: 475 calling frequency Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:401420768:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d41174f49065a7fbd X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Dear all, this would remember many operators of the old way 500 kHz had been used, of course. But to recommend an easier way of modulation, a small FM deviation for the carrier (F2) modulated with 500 Hz would give the same sound when demodulated by a product detector! But for the time being I guess the main problem is that the band becomes really popular in CW! 73 Ha-Jo, DJ1ZB "John Rabson" schrieb: > LF/MF, > > Should we have a specific calling frequency in this allocation, and should it be the practice to use MCW on that channel? > > F5VLF (tongue in cheek) >