Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dh03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id B9BC1380000A7; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:54:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1RoJnU-0008A1-3M for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 19:06:48 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1RoJnT-00089s-Ct for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 19:06:47 +0000 Received: from mail-ww0-f41.google.com ([74.125.82.41]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1RoJnR-0001Qn-3H for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 19:06:47 +0000 Received: by wgbdt11 with SMTP id dt11so982731wgb.4 for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 11:06:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=TcQrANsed2sCDrTObBDh4BN2ZH7Fv2b90GWOhhlhPVo=; b=t1CfBNgI8QUajV2Krw2H+iX/szhzaOQ6sD2PrryMn77JmEkfnISLFLB+/5wC1C1vEQ JiZTFN9oU1bh7HOGz0RvgEPoQf7/PWFoSZqbc8dhw/FKDNyZUhS//51wC8ybahTOYzK3 ELsnmWjU4HavThdCVIZN8wcpcTRLeMN1+amuk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.88.10 with SMTP id bc10mr54100911wib.13.1327086399374; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 11:06:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.210.140 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Jan 2012 11:06:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F1971AD.2040300@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> References: <4F18AC5F.5060809@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4F1971AD.2040300@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 14:06:39 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Douglas D. Williams" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: QRSS-60 to the west Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0444e9f16bc51e04b6fa61f5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:507207232:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m004.1 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d41174f19c65a27ce X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --f46d0444e9f16bc51e04b6fa61f5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Stefan. You are most welcome. :-) On my ARGO display, 700Hz is the CW sidetone "BFO", so whatever frequency I have the radio tuned to should be 700Hz on my ARGO display. Signals on frequencies higher than that should appear above 700Hz, and frequencies lower than that should appear below 700Hz. Here is an example: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/33457409/185300Hz.jpg In this capture, I had the radio tuned to the USA Lowfer "watering hole" of 185.300kHz. You see station "WM" on approx 700Hz (his ID is a graphical ID that varies in frequency approx 0.5Hz), and his claimed transmit frequency is 185.2995kHz. Above him, at approx 701.6 on the ARGO screen, you see Lowfer beacon "WMS", who runs a straight QRSS60 signal on a claimed frequency of 185.3015 kHz. So, having said that, whatever signal (whether it be a QRSS signal or some sort of QRM) that appears below you on last night's screen capture was on an approx frequency of 136.171kHz. I have no idea who (or what) it is, but it appears to be a QRSS signal to me. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/33457409/185300Hz.jpg 73, Doug KB4OER 2012/1/20 Stefan Sch=E4fer > ** > Thank you Doug for the feedback! > Hmm, who could be the other one? I saw VE7SL on the VE2IQ grabber but he > was higher in frequency... Or do you use a LSB receiver? :-) > > 73, Stefan7DK7FC > > > Am 20.01.2012 11:30, schrieb Douglas D. Williams: > > Good copy here in TN, Stefan. Looks like you weren't alone after all, as = I > see another operator slightly below your signal. > > Doug KB4OER > > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/33457409/136172Hz%282%29.jpg > > 2012/1/19 Stefan Sch=E4fer > >> LF, >> >> Again i'm running a lonely beacon tonite at 136.172 kHz (with a small >> offset of -0.1 Hz) in QRSS-60. >> There was rain so a dB is lost but anyway some grabbers over the pond >> catch the first traces. >> Propagation might be a bit better. >> >> 73 all and many thanks to all the grabber runners! That a really good >> service a definitively essential to keep transmitting station (the few) >> motivated to stay on air. >> >> Stefan/DK7FC >> >> PS: After further changes on EMC issues in the system i shall come back >> tomorrow using the IQ converter to generate my VFO signal... >> >> > --f46d0444e9f16bc51e04b6fa61f5 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Stefan. You are most welcome. :-)
=A0
On my ARG= O display, 700Hz is the CW sidetone "BFO", so whatever frequency = I have the radio tuned to should be 700Hz on my ARGO display. Signals on fr= equencies higher than that should appear above 700Hz, and frequencies lower= than that should appear below 700Hz.
=A0
Here is an example:
=A0
=A0
In this capture, I had the rad= io tuned to the USA Lowfer "watering hole" of 185.300kHz. You see= station "WM" on approx 700Hz (his ID is a graphical ID that vari= es in frequency approx 0.5Hz), and his claimed transmit frequency is 185.29= 95kHz. Above him, at approx 701.6 on the ARGO screen, you see Lowfer beacon= "WMS", who runs a straight QRSS60 signal on a claimed frequency = of=A0185.3015 kHz.
=A0
So, having said that, whatever signal (whether it be a Q= RSS signal or some sort of QRM) that appears below you on last night's = screen capture was on an approx frequency of 136.171kHz. I have no idea who= (or what) it is, but it appears to be a QRSS signal to me.
=A0
=A0
=A0
73,
Doug KB4OER


=A0
2012/1/20 Stefan Sch=E4fer <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>= ;
=20 =20
Thank you Doug for the feedback!
Hmm, who could be the other one? I saw VE7SL on the VE2IQ grabber but he was higher in frequency... Or do you use a LSB receiver? :-)

73, Stefan7DK7FC


Am 20.01.2012 11:30, schrieb Douglas D. Williams:
Good copy here in TN, Stefan. Looks like you weren't alone after all, as I see another operator slightly below your signal.
=A0
Doug KB4OER
=A0
2012/1/19 Stefan Sch=E4fer &= lt;Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
LF,

Again i'm running a lonely beacon tonite at 136.172 kHz (with a small offset of -0.1 Hz) in QRSS-60.
There was rain so a dB is lost but anyway some grabbers over the pond catch the first traces.
Propagation might be a bit better.

73 all and many thanks to all the grabber runners! That a really good service a definitively essential to keep transmitting station (the few) motivated to stay on air.

Stefan/DK7FC

PS: After further changes on EMC issues in the system i shall come back tomorrow using the IQ converter to generate my VFO signal...



--f46d0444e9f16bc51e04b6fa61f5--