Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dh02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 5F2C938000088; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 04:37:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Ri0nh-0006Da-3W for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 09:36:57 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Ri0ng-0006DR-N6 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 09:36:56 +0000 Received: from mail-iy0-f171.google.com ([209.85.210.171]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Ri0ne-00072n-CG for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 09:36:56 +0000 Received: by iagw33 with SMTP id w33so44454681iag.16 for ; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 01:36:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mVdqIr+89WP8WMmlpTp477eEwLBqvfsteDsA3NBNqoY=; b=CfitmOMme1LA/2FatK3ZE8aGnTLCLUjmj4pOMv1gmkWVU7FrE/QcuyIwn9ZBjRjyyr m47NTPZZpP57afd2PS0E/3YTSWu9ufwnrYvaqqaAnfAFkEikEa1/7GTpzvTUM2RQnbDi cmdjHi5ygQ8WmLMUuJSNuJf/BZg3lFtqF36mQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.43.131.196 with SMTP id hr4mr52794898icc.55.1325583405930; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 01:36:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.150.144 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Jan 2012 01:36:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <780955996.1040888.1325583040480.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb057> References: <780955996.1040888.1325583040480.JavaMail.fmail@mwmweb057> Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 09:36:45 +0000 Message-ID: From: Andy Talbot To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: OPERA - why it's less data than normal CW ? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:466038816:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m289.1 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d41164f02cc636f01 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Sent slower (narrower bandwidth) and with added error correction bits. If 'someone' would publish the innards of that mode, a simple Tx only keyer could surely be developed, and te mode woue be useful All the clever bits of good error correcting datmodes are in the receiving end. Generating the Tx waveform is trivial - so long as the protocol is open source 'jnt On 3 January 2012 09:30, "Horst St=F6cker" wrote: > Hello, > my first thought was: How can an average word tage more time in CW than i= n Opera? Then I thougth: The Morse code was optimized for being decoded by = ear. If Opera is working binary to be decoded by computer this will be the = reason for less duration - somethin like this http://www-e.uni-magdeburg.de= /jschulen/morse/cw_key.html. > A simple idea and fortunately Opera makes it suitble for ham use. > I hope I can play wit that funny toy tonight at my beacon DI2AN. The prob= lem is, that the keying (normally done by QRSS software)=A0 is done by an o= ld 286 laptop and I am quit sure that Opera will need more power because of= the RX and Internet functions. > However I am looking forward to make it work somehow . . . > vy73 Horst DO1KHS/DI2AN > ___________________________________________________________ > SMS schreiben mit WEB.DE FreeMail - einfach, schnell und > kostenguenstig. Jetzt gleich testen! http://f.web.de/?mc=3D021192 >