Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-ma05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id E240D38000084; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 18:48:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1RreTb-0004sb-B4 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 23:48:03 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1RreTa-0004sS-Sg for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 23:48:02 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1RreTZ-0007es-EK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 23:48:02 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q0TNm0aT026886 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 00:48:00 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q0TNm0RQ005428 for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 00:48:00 +0100 Message-ID: <4F25DA96.3080607@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 00:47:34 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4F246297.4020304@charter.net> <50DDDC5E26754BC284D529DCB4A1C2C3@White> <4F258CB5.2090105@charter.net> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: 2.6 (++) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS=1.166 Subject: VLF: WOLF?? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060002000801080708050203" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:458894240:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d600d4f25dae46cd7 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060002000801080708050203 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hmmmmmmmmmmmm, so what about a WOLF VLF test? Can the program easily be configured to transmit at 8970 Hz? I.e. does it generate a tone at that frequency? Please confirm that no linear mode PA is needed. Wolf 10, means 10 Hz bandwidth? Sorry for the basic questions, i could read the manual but its like reading readme files ;-) Starting with local tests should show the limits and chances. DD7PC who is in 77 km to my fixed location gave a WOLF report today, so maybe... And if OK2BVG can reveive my DFCW-3 from the 300m kite, it may be worth to spend some time for a WOLF. I could ask Michael Oexner first. He is just 45 km distant... 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 29.01.2012 23:40, schrieb Bill de Carle: > At 01:15 PM 1/29/2012, John W1TAG/WD2XES wrote: >> Markus, >> >> Then I'll start on that frequency at 22:00 UT, unless CFH returns. >> Same as last night, WOLF(10) until 0600 UT. > > I "sniffed" a little audio from the output of the TS-850 (tuned to > 135600 USB) without stopping my LF grabber, and as expected, easy copy. > Nothing so far beats Wolf - and if something ever does, it won't be by > much: Wolf is very close to the theoretical performance limit. > > Bill VE2IQ > > 2012-01-29 22:25:33 >WOLF10 -r 8100.174 -f 1693.957 -t 0.2 -w 0.0000 > t: 24 f: 0.001 a: 0.4 dp:119.0 ci: 7 cj: 61 WD2XES FN42CH - > t: 48 f: 0.001 a: 0.4 dp:118.8 ci: 7 cj: 61 WD2XES FN42CH - > t: 96 f: 0.001 a: 0.4 dp:118.1 ci: 7 cj: 61 WD2XES FN42CH - > t: 192 f: 0.000 pm: 6216 jm:838 q: 12.7 12.5 WD2XES FN42CH - > t: 288 f: 0.000 pm:14667 jm:838 q: 16.4 16.4 WD2XES FN42CH - --------------060002000801080708050203 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hmmmmmmmmmmmm, so what about a WOLF VLF test? Can the program easily be configured to transmit at 8970 Hz? I.e. does it generate a tone at that frequency? Please confirm that no linear mode PA is needed. Wolf 10, means 10 Hz bandwidth? Sorry for the basic questions, i could read the manual but its like reading readme files ;-)
Starting with local tests should show the limits and chances.
DD7PC who is in 77 km to my fixed location gave a WOLF report today, so maybe...
And if OK2BVG can reveive my DFCW-3 from the 300m kite, it may be worth to spend some time for a WOLF.
I could ask Michael Oexner first. He is just 45 km distant...

73, Stefan/DK7FC


Am 29.01.2012 23:40, schrieb Bill de Carle:
At 01:15 PM 1/29/2012, John W1TAG/WD2XES wrote:
Markus,

Then I'll start on that frequency at 22:00 UT, unless CFH returns. Same as last night, WOLF(10) until 0600 UT.

I "sniffed" a little audio from the output of the TS-850 (tuned to 135600 USB) without stopping my LF grabber, and as expected, easy copy.
Nothing so far beats Wolf - and if something ever does, it won't be by much: Wolf is very close to the theoretical performance limit.

Bill VE2IQ

2012-01-29 22:25:33 >WOLF10  -r 8100.174 -f 1693.957 -t 0.2 -w 0.0000
t:  24 f: 0.001 a: 0.4 dp:119.0 ci: 7 cj: 61 WD2XES  FN42CH  -
t:  48 f: 0.001 a: 0.4 dp:118.8 ci: 7 cj: 61 WD2XES  FN42CH  -
t:  96 f: 0.001 a: 0.4 dp:118.1 ci: 7 cj: 61 WD2XES  FN42CH  -
t: 192 f: 0.000 pm: 6216 jm:838 q: 12.7 12.5 WD2XES  FN42CH  -
t: 288 f: 0.000 pm:14667 jm:838 q: 16.4 16.4 WD2XES  FN42CH  -
--------------060002000801080708050203--