Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-me06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id A97EF380000B4; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 07:01:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Rpf3l-0004sS-LS for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:01:09 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Rpf3l-0004sJ-77 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:01:09 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Rpf3k-0005Ir-Pd for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:01:09 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q0OC18Es015518 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 13:01:08 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q0OC17tr001601 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 13:01:07 +0100 Message-ID: <4F1E9D6E.30409@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 13:00:46 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4F1DC805.9000808@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <010201ccda2f$113adc50$4001a8c0@lark> In-Reply-To: <010201ccda2f$113adc50$4001a8c0@lark> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id q0OC18Es015518 X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Very special condx over the pole? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:441030656:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d608e4f1e9dab6f17 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hello Alan, Thanks for your comments. Most probably you are right but you know i'm a=20 Dreamer and dreams can sometimes be unrealistic (not like transmissions=20 below 9 kHz ;-) ). DCF39 is also transmitting all the time so probably Scott or those who=20 watch his DCF plot would already know about "magic" propagation. Have a nice day. 73, Stefan Am 24.01.2012 01:08, schrieb Alan Melia: > Hi Stefan increases auroral activity leads to a big increase in noise a= t > high latitudes, what may be more difficult is that there has been a pro= ton > event which have was active from about Thursday last week and was just = dying > away yesterday. The M9 flare this morning produced a huge proton event = one > of the biggest I have seen for ages. These proton events are assocated = with > Polar Cap Absorbtion (PCA) and as Laurence knows (and bemoans) this wil= l > wipe out LF polar routes for some time. > > The auoral curtain is always there (somewhere) and it is possible we be= lieve > to bounce under it. So if the path is such that the ground reflection i= s > under the curtain rather than in the ionosphere, signals may get throug= h. > This means if you are inside the curtain then you need to be about 2000= km > from the opposite side for the signal to get out. > > The so called "large" geomagnetic event isnt that large (!) it was a Kp= =3D5 > minor storm rating and only just. Most of the activity was Kp=3D4. The = Dst was > depressed to -55nT but the Ring Current was quite depleted anyway and t= he > Dst has already risen to -28nT (above -20nT is "good" ) This is a diff= usion > process so is exponential. I guess propagation tonight and tomorrow wil= l be > depressed but I think we then have to wait to see the effect of a CME t= hat > was associated with this morning's M9 flare this could be much bigger a= nd my > be more Earthward pointing. At present the Amination suggests again we = will > miss and direct hit and see a glancing blow from the shock front. This = may > give a major storm (Kp =3D6 or 7) which would depress LF propagation fo= r a > further week or 10 days. > > Not all activity is bad because very long very quiet periods lead to > depressed signal levels too. I tend to think of this as an increased "l= eak" > from an under-ionised E-layer but I could be very wrong in my > hypothesis.....no one has taken me to task on it yet so I keep sticking= my > neck out :-)) > > Alan G3NYK > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Stefan Sch=E4fer" > To: > Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 8:50 PM > Subject: LF: Very special condx over the pole? > > > =20 >> Laurence, Alan, Scott, Jack, Steve, LF-experts... :-) >> >> Yesterday the K indes rised to above 5 so i think we hardly can expect >> "usual" propagation over the pole to AK or VE7. >> >> My question is if there have ever been unusual propagation effects bee= n >> observed, during very strong geomagnectic activity. Things like Aurora >> on VHF or a duct for LF? >> >> The pole and what happens there in the auroral oval is an interesting >> imagination. I think (not being a propagation expert) it is always wor= th >> watching and transmitting. >> >> >> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >> >> =20 > =20