Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dh01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id E72C83800008E; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 15:08:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1RjFxL-0007ZY-LY for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 20:00:03 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1RjFxL-0007ZP-9M for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 20:00:03 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1RjFxJ-0000IF-TK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2012 20:00:03 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q06K01Qf006479 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 21:00:01 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id q06K01Nj019524 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2012 21:00:01 +0100 Message-ID: <4F0752BA.6000609@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 20:59:54 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4F074949.2030809@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <0D2604EF65F24E5C8BAC2695962B2894@AGB> In-Reply-To: <0D2604EF65F24E5C8BAC2695962B2894@AGB> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de id q06K01Qf006479 X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: Traditional QRSS/DFCW modes? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:387050720:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d41154f0754a77a33 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hello G.. Well, you know, i have a lot of time. And no need for stress. Also QSB=20 and a noise background is a useful information and part of an exciting jo= b. BTW i still mustn't transmit on 500 kHz. Is the program for 137 kHz as=20 well? And what about the "gain" compared to say QRSS-60. You know, when is compares with QRSS-3 (or not even) then is is quiet=20 useless for an AK reception on 137 kHz, even if it takes 8 seconds... I missed infos about the "gain", i.e. how many dBs more or less do i=20 have to add to get stable decodes, compared to M copy in QRSS/DFCW. Can=20 you give some infos? Good luck! 73, S.. Am 06.01.2012 20:49, schrieb Graham: > S ... This is a new high speed transport system , in 8 mins you=20 > could be in Alaska ! > > G.. :) > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Stefan Sch=E4fer" > Sent: Friday, January 06, 2012 7:19 PM > To: > Subject: LF: Traditional QRSS/DFCW modes? > >> LF, >> >> Will there be any others in EU/UK except PA3CPM and me transmitting=20 >> the old fashioned QRSS/DFCW modes ? :-) >> >> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >>