Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 11:38:47 -0330 (NST)
From: jcraig@mun.ca
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
In-Reply-To: <4EF9C4C7.8070707@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1112271136130.12288@plato.ucs.mun.ca>
References: <16A89025-8230-409D-A3C8-70D5B7DD56C9@numeo.fr>
 <BF4A524700075746A6467658DFC7102CB0B489A690@ICTS-S-EXC2-CA.luna.kuleuven.be>
 <Pine.LNX.4.64.1112270844540.6973@plato.ucs.mun.ca> <4EF9C4C7.8070707@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: LF: MX, RDL and TA QSO
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0  
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d410e4ef9e53b2e6c
X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25
X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none


Thanks Stefan.  I've uploaded some of the captures of your signals
to the web site:  http://www.ucs.mun.ca/~jcraig/lfex.html
along with a capure of MP on 137.913 kHz.
  Thanks again, congrats and 73

Joe

On Tue, 27 Dec 2011, Stefan Sch=E4fer wrote:

> Hi Joe,
>
> Am 27.12.2011 13:26, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca:
>> [...]
>>=20
>> Many thanks to the patience of DK7FC who managed to complete
>> a QSO with this station, in spite of my poor skills:  the FSK was
q>> again set too low and the QRSS buffer was too small, resulting
>> in truncated messages. DFCW10, QRSS10, 30 and 20 were used here.
>> Stefans QRSS3 yielded a  consistent O copy and was again quite
>> audible at times.
>>=20
>> 73
>> Joe VO1NA
>
> Thank you Joe for the QSO. I wasn't sure if my QRSS-3 signal was visible =
all=20
> the time. But it seems so.
> It was a procedure as in a real QSO, thanks for that.
> A short report:
> First you called me and i didn't see you. Just on the VE2IQ grabber i saw=
=20
> what's going on. I called CQ in QRSS-3 to that time.
> But later your "...NA K" became well visible here, O copy. So i stopped=
=20
> watching other grabbers and mails to start a valid QSO. I asked "?" You w=
ere=20
> calling me again then in QRSS-10. I saw the complete call with QSB, see=
=20
> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/QRSS10_NA1.jpg. The "V" of your call =
was=20
> lost in QSB but i saw your complete call some months ago. So i could have=
=20
> known or assume who was calling (always playing the game as if there is n=
o=20
> internet existing and as if LF is the only band available). Then i asked=
=20
> "VO1NA ?..." and gave you a T report. Later you transmitted QRSS-30 (or 2=
0?)=20
> and became O copy again! You confirmed with "R" See another capture at=20
> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/QRSS10_NA5.jpg (report OO and K). The=
 end=20
> of the QSO can be seen here:=20
> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/QRSS10_NA7.jpg The end would have bee=
n=20
> fine in QRSS-10 as well.
>
> Do you also have some screenshots Joe?
>
> Thanks for that and i hope we can repeat that in DFCW-10 or so, if my gra=
bber=20
> RX is finally a bit more optimised or uses a remote linkand antenna in th=
e=20
> forest. A loop, nulling out DCF39 would have resulted in more than 3 dB S=
/N i=20
> am sure.
>
> 73, Stefan/DK7FC
>
>
This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at
http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2011.php