Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mh05.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id AF43B38000095; Fri, 30 Dec 2011 17:49:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1RglFY-0006Oh-TX for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2011 22:48:32 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1RglFY-0006OY-HC for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2011 22:48:32 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1RglFX-00068N-Kt for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2011 22:48:32 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pBUMmUCW007340 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2011 23:48:30 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id pBUMmUX2018292 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2011 23:48:30 +0100 Message-ID: <4EFE3FBE.60905@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 23:48:30 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <1325270584.34904.YahooMailNeo@web125902.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <4EFE2D08.5020603@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <124CB491DF52459381957EEF8BCF2C5F@JimPC> In-Reply-To: <124CB491DF52459381957EEF8BCF2C5F@JimPC> X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: DK7FC and M0BMU 12-30-2011 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:478888704:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60d94efe3fec5b33 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none LF, Just got an email from Doug, KB4OER from EM86UI who sent me a capture showing his reception of last night. Apart from my signal there are clear traces of M0BMU and G3KEV. This is another new TA LF receiving stations and i find it quite fascinating to see the development and interest of a daily growing auditory across the pond! It is a very good development and i think we can do more exciting experiments in the future! The capture he sent me is at http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/FC%2CBMU%2CKEV%40KB4OER_.jpg The location between the other "across the pond" stns (except KL7UK, sri Laurence ;-) ) can be found here: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/WEST-US%2BCA_22UTC_30DEC.png Distance to me is 7103 km. 73 and let's hope for another exciting night/morning Stefan/DK7FC Am 30.12.2011 23:21, schrieb James Moritz: > Dear Andy, Stefan, LF Group, > > Yes I was transmitting DFCW60; I have just started the beacon set for > DFCW90 for tonight. I think Stefan is right about the longer elements > making the signal more readable under marginal conditions with the > same FFT settings, especially for DFCW. Of course the down side is > that everything takes longer... But that is not too important for a > beacon, so we will see if it is an improvement. > > It is a rather wet night here in IO91vr, but the wind seems to be > quite light, giving the antenna an easier time. > > Cheers, Jim Moritz > 73 de M0BMU