Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-md04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 0022C380000A4; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 13:06:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1RdQ9e-0003aa-HT for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 17:40:38 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1RdQ9e-0003aR-38 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 17:40:38 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1RdQ9d-0008Vy-LE for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 17:40:38 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pBLHebkO030813 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 18:40:37 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id pBLHebhr013185 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 18:40:37 +0100 Message-ID: <4EF219A7.3000009@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 18:38:47 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <002701ccbf2c$961a3d30$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf><001b01ccbf47$caa361b0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf><4EF128FA.30001@gmail.com><000f01ccbfc0$412f59b0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf><4EF1EC60.3010900@gmail.com><000f01ccbfef$75078da0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <000f01ccbff9$426c2f90$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> In-Reply-To: <000f01ccbff9$426c2f90$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Fw: TA CONDX/QSO Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------080304050505060801030506" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:469204192:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60584ef220357a2e X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------080304050505060801030506 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit That is grumpy OT stuff!! Just reflecting these OLD times? They are GONE!!! GONE, GONE, GONE! Focus on the _presence_ and the _future_ and do something useful with your time and transmitter! You go to bed when the band is opening for TA. Fractions of your signal are visible in the US in a QRSS-60 window but you daily complain to the US stations that they do no CW QSO with you. You say you are in "QSO" mode and QSX 7033 kHz but do not even hear DL7ET, not even VE2IQ. You take the time to complain about beacon mode while EW6GB is calling CQ in QSO mode. A LF stations seems to become uninteresting once you worked it and placed the checkmark beside the call in the logbook. All the time that nerving CW. When was you last real CW QSO and who was the other station? Me? I mean a real CW LF/LF QSO! That is a poor and sad show what you present us here each day. Really not motivating for newcomers, newcomers on the band and on this group. I've often got the suggestion from others to install a g3kevmal@talktalk.net email filter, like they did. I think its time to really think about that! Stefan/DK7FC Am 21.12.2011 16:57, schrieb mal hamilton: > It was all CW in the beginning > There was some QRS QSO'S taking place > A lot of stn around EU that ultimately became active > The band was humming at one time > Nearly every night that I was active in those days > Like I have said before the procedure these days has completely changed --------------080304050505060801030506 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit That is grumpy OT stuff!! Just reflecting these OLD times? They are GONE!!! GONE, GONE, GONE!

Focus on the presence and the future and do something useful with your time and transmitter!

You go to bed when the band is opening for TA.

Fractions of your signal are visible in the US in a QRSS-60 window but you daily complain to the US stations that they do no CW QSO with you.

You say you are in "QSO" mode and QSX 7033 kHz but do not even hear DL7ET, not even VE2IQ.

You take the time to complain about beacon mode while EW6GB is calling CQ in QSO mode.

A LF stations seems to become uninteresting once you worked it and placed the checkmark beside the call in the logbook.

All the time that nerving CW. When was you last real CW QSO and who was the other station? Me? I mean a real CW LF/LF QSO!

That is a poor and sad show what you present us here each day. Really not motivating for newcomers, newcomers on the band and on this group.

I've often got the suggestion from others to install a g3kevmal@talktalk.net  email filter, like they did. I think its time to really think about that!


Stefan/DK7FC


Am 21.12.2011 16:57, schrieb mal hamilton: 
It was all CW in the beginning
There was some QRS QSO'S taking place
A lot of stn around EU that ultimately became active
The band was humming at one time
Nearly every night that I was active in those days
Like I have said before the procedure these days has completely changed

--------------080304050505060801030506--