Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mh02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 3A09F3800009A; Thu, 8 Dec 2011 18:03:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1RYmgR-00046I-Mc for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2011 22:43:19 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1RYmgR-000469-7s for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2011 22:43:19 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1RYmgP-0004MS-NA for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2011 22:43:19 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id pB8MhGfV028949 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2011 23:43:17 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id pB8MhGSw031630 for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2011 23:43:16 +0100 Message-ID: <4EE13D23.1080308@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 23:41:39 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4EDF61FF.8080003@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4EE0B1E0.2010401@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id pB8MhGfV028949 X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: TA: VO1NA...CW... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:486600256:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60d64ee1425a2b7b X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Joe, That's nice!!! OK, i will QSY to 136.500 kHz and will run a CW beacon there, as soon as=20 my current call transmission is finished. Hope this QRG is OK for you? I=20 will also listen from time to time on that QRG. Any reports, also from others, apprechiated. Please tell me when it is OK for you about the test. I'm waiting for=20 your answer. 73, Stefan7DK7FC PS: What about the questions below? ;-) Am 08.12.2011 22:38, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca: > Hi Stefan, > > Nice QRSS and audible copy on you at the moment. > Can you try some CW? > > Joe > > On Thu, 8 Dec 2011, Stefan Sch=E4fer wrote: > >> Hi Joe, >> >> Am 08.12.2011 02:40, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca: >>> Hi Stefan, >>> >>> Can you try some CW. There is no doubt that your signal is audible. >> Really? That is great! I never expected that all that what happens in=20 >> the last months will be possible for me on a fixed antenna. >> >> I've been in bed to the time you wrote that mail here at 2 AM local,=20 >> sorry. >> >> Well, about CW, sure i can TX CW within SpecLab and also my hardware=20 >> is ready for handmade CW, just the key is somewhere else. I would be=20 >> very interested in a wav file to hear my CW on the other side of the=20 >> pond, so if this is possible please record a minute for me :-) >> I think i won't hear you in CW, at least from the location where my=20 >> RX is running. I could try from /p in a quiet location with my=20 >> ferrite antenna which is much better! But that may be a high effort=20 >> to go in the forest in darkness (aaaah, help!! ;-) ). >> What do you think is the best time for a longer QSO? If we come to a=20 >> QSO, i would like to do a "real" QSO, not just "NA FC O K" or so. I=20 >> think i can receive you in DFCW-10 or so. You can check that from=20 >> time to time on my LF grabber at=20 >> http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_LF_Grabber.html >> >> Another question is the frequency? What would you suggest? Should i=20 >> TX on 136.172 and you on 137.777? Sometimes there is QRM due to=20 >> luxembourg effect signals (as Markus explained me) near DCF and HGA.=20 >> So a frequency in the center of the band may be more suitable. >> >> Anyway, the first and only question is the time. I've been watching=20 >> out for you yesterday and made some longer breaks between my=20 >> transmissions but saw no NA. Later i called you in DFCW-15 which was=20 >> nicely received by W1VD=20 >> (http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/W1VD_DK7FC_DFCW15.jpg). I wasn't=20 >> sure if DFCW-15 is a good choice since it may be to fast for a slow=20 >> scrolling spectrogram. Also i have to use a higher shift (choosed 1=20 >> Hz) which may become problematic if other stations are transmitting=20 >> in that EU60 DX sector. So i thought it may be the best if we QSY to=20 >> 137.70 for a QSO but i am not sure if you can quickly resonate to=20 >> another frequency. For me, QSY takes about 1 minute in the current=20 >> hardware situation. >> >> So, what do you suggest? >> >> I suggest simply running beacon transmissions and watching the RX=20 >> during the breaks. If i can see you then in my QRSS-10 window=20 >> (splitted spectrogram on my LF grabber) with suitable S/N i would QSY=20 >> to 137.7 and call you. If you can hear me in CW, then DFCW-3(or4)=20 >> should be no problem at all, even if there is a QSB of 10 dB. >> >> Looking forward to all! :-) >> >> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >> >> >> > This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions a= t > http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2011= .php=20 > >