Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mh06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id E213A3800010D; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 13:57:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1RY09w-0006mD-Cu for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 18:54:32 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1RY09v-0006m4-Uk for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 18:54:31 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1RY09u-0006th-BQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 18:54:31 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pB6IsTr1021952 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 19:54:29 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id pB6IsT78014215 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 19:54:29 +0100 Message-ID: <4EDE6485.2050902@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 19:52:53 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4EDD515F.6060800@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <009801ccb3b1$a6b20690$4001a8c0@lark> <4EDD6968.1030002@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <003601ccb411$95635320$4001a8c0@lark> In-Reply-To: <003601ccb411$95635320$4001a8c0@lark> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de id pB6IsTr1021952 X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: Re: TA 137 kHz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:516255168:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60da4ede657f7801 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Alan, Am 06.12.2011 12:35, schrieb Alan Melia: > [...] One must remember that the display of grabbers is very non-linear > there is only about a 3dB change in signal strength to go from T to O a= nd > then little obvious change until it "dog-bones", so they are not ideal = for > seeing the detail of fading on a signal which it at least O, except whe= n it > drops right out. Hm, well, but within SpecLab you know you can configure a coloured=20 spectrogram where the colour is related to the signal strength. And you=20 can directly read the signal level or/and the S/N. Depending on how=20 sharp the contrast is adjusted, - which is also visible on the clour bar=20 in most spectrograms -, a changing signal level can be clearly seen,=20 even if a signal remains at "O copy". This is what i saw yesterday. Also you can configure a plotter that shows you a dip, either in signal=20 levels or in the background noise. Such a plot is running on the TF3HZ=20 grabber as well, which gives further interesting informations about=20 daily LF propagation. > You are also seeing not a real signal strength but more a > S/N display which depends very much on local noise conditions. > =20 As long as a the noiseblanker and/or clipper and/or AGC is activated=20 (which is mostly the case) i agree :-) > Great work keep it up! > =20 Thank you. I hope to leave some traces in 5X today, which is the last=20 night of the 5X grabber as Alex stated. Also keep up the good work and discussions. Best 73, Stefan/DK7FC > Best Wishes > Alan G3NYK > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Stefan Sch=E4fer" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 1:01 AM > Subject: Re: LF: Re: TA 137 kHz > > > Hi Alan, > > Yes, ther is strong QSB at W1VD. I was watching his grabber in the last > hour but my signal was lost then. Anyway i saved the cpature i saw when > i first saw my signal. Now the capture is here too: > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/grabupload1.jpg > QRSS-10 is relatively fast and it would be interesting to have a beacon > running in that speed. Will first have a look on the TX system since > there have been strong winds here. > I hope for better propagation soon. > TF3HZ seems not to care about propagation ;-) His grabber always shows > very good signals. > > 73, nw gn, Stefan/DK7FC > > Am 06.12.2011 01:54, schrieb Alan Melia: > =20 >> Hi Stefan >> Interesting not a lot has changed in the last couple of days though th= e >> =20 > Dst > =20 >> did recover from -30nT on the 4th to about -15nT today but that should= not >> have dramatic effects. There was a small flare C5 just before midnight= but >> that would only affect paths in daylight. Maybe you got favourable fad= ing >> conditions tonight. >> >> Alan >> G3NYK >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Stefan Sch=E4fer" >> To: >> Sent: Monday, December 05, 2011 11:18 PM >> Subject: LF: TA 137 kHz >> >> >> >> =20 >>> Jay, LF, >>> >>> Propagation seems to be back ;-) >>> http://www.w1vd.com/grabber.html >>> >>> Many thanks for looking Jay. Never expected to see my signal in QRSS-= 10 >>> on your grabber :-) >>> >>> 73, Stefan/DK7FC >>> >>> >>> =20 >> =20 > =20