Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mc04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id D7EEF380000BC; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 04:38:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1RcZeJ-0002En-Ly for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 09:36:47 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1RcZeJ-0002Ee-6W for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 09:36:47 +0000 Received: from nm3-vm0.bt.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.146.182.230]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1RcZeI-00081R-Pn for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 09:36:47 +0000 Received: from [217.146.183.197] by nm3.bt.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 Dec 2011 09:36:41 -0000 Received: from [217.146.183.204] by tm3.bt.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 Dec 2011 09:36:41 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1002.bt.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 19 Dec 2011 09:36:40 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 996883.66864.bm@omp1002.bt.mail.ukl.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 6665 invoked from network); 19 Dec 2011 09:36:40 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btopenworld.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=hcCYxPcwFK0ijcd5nrUOqrt8EbPwSNJO4pSV7NPnpC4k1q0pJqAKtlEHS0vx/OIRr8dutL5keIGikvFJvkGeJC+hCeMLLmtobG1xUBmArDkpR3/dRx4wdFuwB5MtpJ+0cffSMYyRlifUxto/X9onNhB6aaetsInZCtcSYRQfK+s= ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btopenworld.com; s=s1024; t=1324287400; bh=KZv4quS0ZaTn07u2bcXkCl5L6bEid9xfqYXS13dyQ2s=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=G6mzSCBbzJi2Z0oeAZvKqOOr9MxrcJXi4goRyoQ0CaW4cqUHoJhefZpKB6SD2AniUlLL9gK4E5nLAQriCpTKCnD4Oa/cKpVXP2iNqphOZNGoLSeq32ejoNDWa6aDrBwY017WfWxHCML+GWdJE8I44wjY0S4v0cijoX7xs5Owt4Y= X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: cMyH6p0VM1mu5EkPyuJebvDQHJUOn3.Bmj.aZ1qSOrBSl.u 1h7830340V3F_9EMahyA0t6CDebq9QRI1atmt707sr60kcUi1XOZd1JB3Tu7 Sxkb7BKeBneo0VGMZghr5f4LS6didpGCrSfJTtLqb3Ck0mJoIz5EwzjmpEud Byw1dy7mGLt5EzrlRGGHsF_wyDGYl7_0k64YLb_BX85KHuHMWAabwupxe3Cu WZU2ClknaJSlD3RBEdt3hZQUqDrG2e.1LlFqX5M.ZT8NpOR_cdp8Q6splB6l D2MbiXgQA5a0D4nqzX.ItRtH95hQWIY..mAozBNg4ODLALyfvMcr2eqhLw_o u1u_zjd8YyNHlm.x28ov7quABzzXvC.F6KEJJ4.qSRZITJjt22be1LFruJ96 ZFORWfUmj68AUcmmEJw-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: Cxhli3eswBD1ozmtAojhjrja86kWx0Qm9tycD5QR1DKWrOLgjJcXkw-- Received: from JimPC (james.moritz@86.183.181.71 with login) by smtp826.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 19 Dec 2011 01:36:40 -0800 PST Message-ID: <08C805D2A1C04E64836275C632577CF2@JimPC> From: "James Moritz" To: References: <033201ccbcab$5c5fe640$1502a8c0@Clemens04> <000901ccbcc4$42768fe0$c763afa0$@com> <4EECC1E8.4000806@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <002c01ccbd6f$572761c0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <39D91133A64A480596FBAA4395D85812@JimPC> <007901ccbd9e$69fe2ed0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> In-Reply-To: <007901ccbd9e$69fe2ed0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 09:36:58 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18197 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18463 DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001 Subject: LF: Re: TX system at DK7FC, schematic Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:493171008:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m287.2 ; domain : btopenworld.com DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d604c4eef0603438b X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Dear Mal, LF Group, > The highest Q coils I have seen are self supporting encased in a helium > container and the Q specified was only in a few hundred. What sort of coil > construction yields 4000 and above ? > I have yet to encounter such a specimen Errm.... The sort of specimen shown in the picture you sent to everyone yesterday, i.e., a coil a few metres in diameter wound using very large litz wire. The highest Q LF coil I have made so far had 109 turns of 729-strand litz wire wound on a plastic former about 400mm diameter. L was about 4mH and Q measured at 1100. Stefan's loading coil uses similar construction and has similar Q. A coil of similar size and inductance wound with PVC insulated copper wire had a Q of only about 300. For a given inductance and type of construction, Q increases with size, but only slowly. The size required to reach a given Q seems to reduce fairly slowly with increasing frequency. This is part of the reason for VLF loading coils being so large. The "helium coils" were discussed on this reflector some time ago - they were loading coils for HF mobile whips. A Q of a few hundred for a fairly large coil is not remarkable; obviously, the size of coil is limited for a practical mobile whip. The helium was just a sales gimmick that would make no significant difference to Q. Cheers, Jim Moritz 73 de M0BMU