Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-da02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 4B48E380000A1; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 13:10:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1RdQbW-000421-TX for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 18:09:26 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1RdQbW-00041s-DU for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 18:09:26 +0000 Received: from out1.ip07ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.243]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1RdQbT-0000Kq-UC for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 18:09:26 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Au8AAGgg8k5cHnRG/2dsb2JhbABDlzSEEo5mgXCBBoFtBQEBBQgBAQNJAhMZAQEDBQIBAxEEAQEKJRQBBBoGFggGEwoBAgIBAYdrt3yMDwSCWoUqhQEpAZoC X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,389,1320624000"; d="scan'208,217";a="19257964" Received: from host-92-30-116-70.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.30.116.70]) by out1.ip07ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 21 Dec 2011 18:09:17 +0000 Message-ID: <006201ccc00b$a6933420$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <002701ccbf2c$961a3d30$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf><001b01ccbf47$caa361b0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf><4EF128FA.30001@gmail.com><000f01ccbfc0$412f59b0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf><4EF1EC60.3010900@gmail.com><000f01ccbfef$75078da0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <000f01ccbff9$426c2f90$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <4EF219A7.3000009@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 18:09:15 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Fw: TA CONDX/QSO Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_005F_01CCC00B.A65C45A0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:481307040:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d404a4ef221036a94 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_005F_01CCC00B.A65C45A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I had a QSO with EW6GB years ago You cannot hear me, or anyone else on CW with your micro ferrite rod. Beacon mode especially QRS 60 - 6000 is so easy but QSO CW needs an = expert. To answer your question I have worked over 35 countries on LF CW Concentrate on your RX antenna and the Euro By all means get a FILTER that only allows BEACON QRS6000 hardly state = of the art communications when the rest of the world is moving at = MEGABYTES=20 =20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Stefan Sch=E4fer=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 5:38 PM Subject: Re: LF: Re: Fw: TA CONDX/QSO That is grumpy OT stuff!! Just reflecting these OLD times? They are = GONE!!! GONE, GONE, GONE! Focus on the presence and the future and do something useful with your = time and transmitter!=20 You go to bed when the band is opening for TA.=20 Fractions of your signal are visible in the US in a QRSS-60 window but = you daily complain to the US stations that they do no CW QSO with you. You say you are in "QSO" mode and QSX 7033 kHz but do not even hear = DL7ET, not even VE2IQ. You take the time to complain about beacon mode while EW6GB is calling = CQ in QSO mode. A LF stations seems to become uninteresting once you worked it and = placed the checkmark beside the call in the logbook. All the time that nerving CW. When was you last real CW QSO and who = was the other station? Me? I mean a real CW LF/LF QSO! That is a poor and sad show what you present us here each day. Really = not motivating for newcomers, newcomers on the band and on this group. I've often got the suggestion from others to install a = g3kevmal@talktalk.net email filter, like they did. I think its time to = really think about that! Stefan/DK7FC Am 21.12.2011 16:57, schrieb mal hamilton:=20 It was all CW in the beginning There was some QRS QSO'S taking place A lot of stn around EU that ultimately became active The band was humming at one time Nearly every night that I was active in those days Like I have said before the procedure these days has completely changed ------=_NextPart_000_005F_01CCC00B.A65C45A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I had a QSO with EW6GB years ago
You cannot hear me, or anyone else on CW = with your=20 micro ferrite rod.
Beacon mode especially QRS 60 - 6000  is so = easy but=20 QSO CW needs an expert.
To answer your question I have worked over 35 = countries on=20 LF CW
 Concentrate on your RX antenna and the=20 Euro
By all means get a FILTER that only allows = BEACON QRS6000=20 hardly state of the art communications when the rest of the world is = moving at=20 MEGABYTES
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Stefan = Sch=E4fer
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, = 2011 5:38=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: Fw: TA=20 CONDX/QSO

That is grumpy OT stuff!! Just reflecting these OLD = times? They=20 are GONE!!! GONE, GONE, GONE!

Focus on the presence and = the=20 future and do something useful with your time and transmitter!=20

You go to bed when the band is opening for TA. =

Fractions of=20 your signal are visible in the US in a QRSS-60 window but you daily = complain=20 to the US stations that they do no CW QSO with you.

You say you = are in=20 "QSO" mode and QSX 7033 kHz but do not even hear DL7ET, not even=20 VE2IQ.

You take the time to complain about beacon mode while = EW6GB is=20 calling CQ in QSO mode.

A LF stations seems to become = uninteresting=20 once you worked it and placed the checkmark beside the call in the=20 logbook.

All the time that nerving CW. When was you last real = CW QSO=20 and who was the other station? Me? I mean a real CW LF/LF = QSO!

That is=20 a poor and sad show what you present us here each day. Really not = motivating=20 for newcomers, newcomers on the band and on this group.

I've = often got=20 the suggestion from others to install a g3kevmal@talktalk.net  = email=20 filter, like they did. I think its time to really think about=20 that!


Stefan/DK7FC


Am 21.12.2011 16:57, schrieb = mal=20 hamilton:=20 
It was all CW in the =
beginning
There was some QRS QSO'S taking =
place
A lot of stn around EU that ultimately =
became active
The band was humming at one =
time
Nearly every night that I was active in =
those days
Like I have said before the procedure these =
days has completely =
changed

------=_NextPart_000_005F_01CCC00B.A65C45A0--