Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dg06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 6D171380000AE; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 17:51:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1RSzAI-0007AH-Os for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 22:50:10 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1RSzAI-0007A8-9B for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 22:50:10 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1RSzAH-0001mx-5d for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 22:50:10 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pAMMo71B008381 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 23:50:08 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id pAMMo71d018392 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 23:50:07 +0100 Message-ID: <4ECC26CD.6070705@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 23:48:45 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4ECC05DA.9030009@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: LF conds... Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090505020203060208010105" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 1:2:476316928:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 1 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d410e4ecc27584e21 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090505020203060208010105 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit OK Lubos, Conds to the west seem to be fine though. There is excellent low noise and good propagation to/at TF3HZ http://simnet.is/halldorgudmunds/TF3HZ_LFgrabber/ G3XDV, DF6NM and PA3CPM and me leave very well readable traces there today. Also my signal starts to show up at VE2IQ http://www.magma.ca/~ve2iq/grabs/index.htm with no to strong QSB... I hope the 5X RX is running although there seem to be no upload of captures to the web page... There have been 7 EU stations some day ago on 136.17 kHz. Easily we could become 10. That would be a fun, isn't it? :-) 73, Stefan Am 22.11.2011 23:00, schrieb Lubos OK2BVG: > Hello Stefan! > As for VLF and MW conditions, I think the same. My friend OK1FED told > me, that he did a QSO with KH2 on 160m some days before. The > conditions had been super, but than they fell down. > > The weather is not good for my fly a kite. It is cloudy, foggy and > cold all week long :-( > > 73! > > Lubos, oK2BVG > > ****************** > > > Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 21:28:10 +0100 > > From: Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de > > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > > Subject: LF: LF conds... > > > > Today the LF conds seem to be worse than yesterday, i'm missing > about 10 > > dB S/N on the grabbers, at least to the east. > > > > After watching the conds and the grabbers for some months now it > appears > > to me that the path to the east (from my location) is stronger affected > > by a K index of 2...3 (today) than the west path. Maybe this is a total > > nonsense what i am writing here but at least it appears to me like > that ;-) > > > > Has someone observed the same? > > > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > > > PS: Now finished the new variometer on the new coil. Can now manually > > resonate over the entire band again. Tmw the drive engine will be > > mounted on the roof, turning the variometer over an non-conductive rod. > > --------------090505020203060208010105 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de id pAMMo71B008381 OK Lubos,

Conds to the west seem to be fine though.
There is excellent low noise and good propagation to/at TF3HZ http://simnet.is/halldorgudmunds/TF3HZ_LFgrabber/

G3XDV, DF6NM and PA3CPM and me leave very well readable traces there today. Also my signal starts to show up at VE2IQ
http://www.magma.ca/~ve2iq/grabs/index.htm with no to s= trong QSB...

I hope the 5X RX is running although there seem to be no upload of captures to the web page...

There have been 7 EU stations some day ago on 136.17 kHz. Easily we could become 10. That would be a fun, isn't it? :-)

73, Stefan


Am 22.11.2011 23:00, schrieb Lubos OK2BVG:
Hello Stefan!
As for VLF and MW conditions, I think the same. My friend OK1FED told me, that he did a QSO with KH2 on 160m some days before. The conditions had been super, but than they fell down.

The weather is not good for my fly a kite. It is cloudy, foggy and cold all week long :-(

73!

Lubos, oK2BVG

******************=A0

> Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 21:28:10 +0100
> From: Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
> Subject: LF: LF conds...
>
> Today the LF conds seem to be worse than yesterday, i'm missing about 10
> dB S/N on the grabbers, at least to the east.
>
> After watching the conds and the grabbers for some months now it appears
> to me that the path to the east (from my location) is stronger affected
> by a K index of 2...3 (today) than the west path. Maybe this is a total
> nonsense what i am writing here but at least it appears to me like that ;-)
>
> Has someone observed the same?
>
> 73, Stefan/DK7FC
>
> PS: Now finished the new variometer on the new coil. Can now manually
> resonate over the entire band again. Tmw the drive engine will be > mounted on the roof, turning the variometer over an non-conductive rod.
>
--------------090505020203060208010105--