Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dk04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 28255380000F1; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 12:40:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1RQ0Vi-0005YJ-Ph for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:39:58 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1RQ0Vi-0005YA-AQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:39:58 +0000 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1RQ0Vh-0000HC-SF for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:39:58 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pAEHdu7F006755 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:39:56 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id pAEHdssw020843 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:39:56 +0100 Message-ID: <4EC1521E.80806@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:38:38 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <002101cca2e3$ed12cd10$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>,<4EC1485D.6090200@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: Conditions Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020307040904000907060007" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:494625088:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1db4084ec152a67574 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020307040904000907060007 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Laurence, OK, that sounds interesting. What mode would you suggest? QRSS-30? And what start time? I want to be as far as possible distant to the center frequency for QSO mode so i think 725 is fine. Soon then back on 136.172. Maybe we all can discuss about a region where QRSS-10 (and/or 3) beaconing would be apprechiated. I would suggest a something arround 137.630 or so, since a splitted spectrogram can be set up then, displaying the QSO mode region and the beacon region. There won't be many beacon signals in QRSS/DFCW10 i expect, so covering a range of 10 to 20 Hz should suffice ? Good about xmas at home. We'll do some interesting things then i hope :-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 14.11.2011 18:16, schrieb Laurence KL7UK: > I was /Mobile here in Oklahoma last night and listened around > 0000-0200utc - DCF39 wasnt very strong compared to how it can be - > something like S4 peaks and Ive seen S9+ still it was better on the > path than the previous night. > > Ive just taken a longer term reading of DCF39 in Alaska and the path > is improving all the time - at Eu sunset (a littel while ago) and just > after the s/n is some 29dB and maybe worth an early evening "go" and > compared with the more normal per dawn Eu path. Ive shoved the snapper > on the window 137.712/728 at dot 30 for the moment (Ive never received > an Eu signal at a higher speed honest guv) but theres always a first > time. If you want it moved to another part of the spectrum give me an > email direct. > > Good signal from the car from VX9MRC here last night in Oklahoma. Good > news for me is that Ill be home in Alaska from Dec 22 to Jan 8 :-) > > > > Laurence KL7UK /5 --------------020307040904000907060007 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Laurence,

OK, that sounds interesting. What mode would you suggest? QRSS-30? And what start time?

I want to be as far as possible distant to the center frequency for QSO mode so i think 725 is fine. Soon then back on 136.172.

Maybe we all can discuss about a region where QRSS-10 (and/or 3) beaconing would be apprechiated. I would suggest a something arround 137.630 or so, since a splitted spectrogram can be set up then, displaying the QSO mode region and the beacon region. There won't be many beacon signals in QRSS/DFCW10 i expect, so covering a range of 10 to 20 Hz should suffice ?

Good about xmas at home. We'll do some interesting things then i hope :-)

73, Stefan/DK7FC


Am 14.11.2011 18:16, schrieb Laurence KL7UK:
 I was /Mobile here in Oklahoma last night and listened around 0000-0200utc - DCF39 wasnt very strong compared to how it can be - something like S4 peaks and Ive seen S9+ still it was better on the path than the previous night.
 
Ive just taken a longer term reading of DCF39 in Alaska and the path is improving all the time - at Eu sunset (a littel while ago) and just after the s/n is some 29dB and maybe worth an early evening "go" and compared with the more normal per dawn Eu path. Ive shoved the snapper on the window 137.712/728 at dot 30 for the moment (Ive never received an Eu signal at a higher speed honest guv) but theres always a first time. If you want it moved to another part of the spectrum give me an email direct.
 
Good signal from the car from VX9MRC here last night in Oklahoma. Good news for me is that Ill be home in Alaska from Dec 22 to Jan 8 :-)
 
 
 
Laurence KL7UK /5
--------------020307040904000907060007--