Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-db02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 3A1C238000087; Sat, 5 Nov 2011 09:21:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1RMgAk-0003si-47 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 13:20:34 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1RMgAj-0003sZ-Gf for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 13:20:33 +0000 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1RMgAi-0004nB-5O for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 05 Nov 2011 13:20:33 +0000 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id pA5DKVvN018063 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 5 Nov 2011 14:20:31 +0100 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id pA5DKV10015861 for ; Sat, 5 Nov 2011 14:20:31 +0100 Message-ID: <4EB537DB.5080707@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2011 14:19:23 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4EB5344B.5000008@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <4EB5344B.5000008@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: CW/136.5 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000506090603010302050602" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 1:2:457801312:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 1 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40564eb538573401 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000506090603010302050602 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id pA5DKVvN018063 PS: The TX QTH is here: http://no.nonsense.ee/qthmap/?qth=3DJN49IK64GM That is even 3.8 km to the TX and well outside any electricity as you=20 can see. So i expect much more chances to receive weaker signals in CW! 73 Am 05.11.2011 14:04, schrieb Stefan Sch=E4fer: > LF, > > I'm going to do some /p *CW tests in an hour. QRG is then 136.5 kHz.* > > The TX is my usual LF antenna in the city, keyed via a UHF link out of=20 > about 2 km distance. That should be a quiet location. > > The first time all the stuff finds its place in a backpack. See:=20 > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/UHF%20Link.JPG > > Not sure if the antenna has enough gain for the distance but i expect=20 > it will be ok. > > Note that i am using the *active ferrite antenna for RX*. Thus it may=20 > happen that i am nulling out a calling station, so it is worth to call=20 > several times, if you like. > > The PTT of the TX is quasi connected to the squelch LED of the UHF RX.=20 > That works very fine up to >125 Bpm. But maybe it opens sometimes due=20 > to a local noise. To the PTT circuit i have added a time limiting=20 > watchdog circuit that limits such an unwanted opening to about 10 secon= ds. > > So, looking forward to some *QSOs* or at least a succesful testing.=20 > BTW there is no possibility to answer in QRSS. It is still CW exclusive= ly! > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC > > --------------000506090603010302050602 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by relay.uni-heidelberg.de id pA5DKVvN018063 PS: The TX QTH is here: http://no.nonsense.ee/qthmap/?q= th=3DJN49IK64GM

That is even 3.8 km to the TX and well outside any electricity as you can see. So i expect much more chances to receive weaker signals in CW!
73


Am 05.11.2011 14:04, schrieb Stefan Sch=E4fer:
LF,

I'm going to do some /p CW tests in an hour. QRG is then 136.5 kHz.

The TX is my usual LF antenna in the city, keyed via a UHF link out of about 2 km distance. That should be a quiet location.

The first time all the stuff finds its place in a backpack. See: http://dl.dr= opbox.com/u/19882028/LF/UHF%20Link.JPG

Not sure if the antenna has enough gain for the distance but i expect it will be ok.

Note that i am using the active ferrite antenna for RX. Thus it may happen that i am nulling out a calling station, so it is worth to call several times, if you like.

The PTT of the TX is quasi connected to the squelch LED of the UHF RX. That works very fine up to >125 Bpm. But maybe it opens sometimes due to a local noise. To the PTT circuit i have added a time limiting watchdog circuit that limits such an unwanted opening to about 10 seconds.

So, looking forward to some QSOs or at least a succesful testing. BTW there is no possibility to answer in QRSS. It is still CW exclusively!

73, Stefan/DK7FC


--------------000506090603010302050602--