Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mk01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 98286380000AE; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:43:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1RFux5-0002Ft-Bq for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:42:31 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1RFux4-0002Fk-Ss for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:42:30 +0100 Received: from smtp6.freeserve.com ([193.252.22.192]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1RFux1-00069m-VI for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:42:30 +0100 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3622.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 22AD07000077 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 23:42:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3622.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 16E3F700007B for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 23:42:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from AGB (unknown [2.26.8.67]) by mwinf3622.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with SMTP id EB5C87000077 for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2011 23:42:21 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20111017214221964.EB5C87000077@mwinf3622.me.freeserve.com Message-ID: From: "Graham" To: References: <4E9C2B75.8050509@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 22:42:21 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 111017-0, 17/10/2011), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP=0.234 Subject: Re: LF: Fwd: [SDR-IQ] FCC issues Experimental License Grant WF2XXQ to operate on 130KC and 500KC bands Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:416969888:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d61854e9ca1827b00 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Well Worth checking :)) , The recent history of English words and radio regulations is non = too=20 coherent , with the un-intended allocation of data to the EU and t= he=20 accidental and calamitous use of the (... ...) word ... anything = is=20 possible , the only sure thing is the answer is =3D 42 Yes sad point on the applied and eventual on air status ... not=20 just confined to the other side of pond either ... reception and= =20 transmitting are really two hobbies, some times combined, from long= =20 ago, one memorable comment was, '' for every minuet you talking you= =20 missing 10 interesting things you could be hearing'' kind of ma= kes=20 sense? Ae wise , 2 square inches of PCB to receive and a sma= ll=20 ranch to transmit may have something to do with it on 136 , 500 = , Still a lot of myths about over Ae sizes, the standard marine set = up=20 was not much more than 30 to 40 feet of wire from the roof o= f=20 the radio room to the top 'T' wire .. ok the boat and the se= a=20 helped, a fan vertical feed and the funnel woks nicely for the=20 'gray line' but you can see the point , these are not 'big' arr= ays=20 ? 73 -G.. -------------------------------------------------- From: "Warren Ziegler" Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 3:20 PM To: Subject: Re: LF: Fwd: [SDR-IQ] FCC issues Experimental License Grant WF2X= XQ=20 to operate on 130KC and 500KC bands > > Graham, Stefan, > > The license does state that the operator must stay within band > limits despite the 95% frequency tolerance (which is an obvious > error). > As for the phrase 'amateurs in Miami Florida' he is referring to > himself and a friend who is helping him out with the antenna - not ALL > amateurs in Florida! > It is very common for hams here to use the phrase "VLF" to refer to > EVERYTHING below the medium wave broadcast band. > Many times I have been asked about my "VLF" operation and it turns out > the person wanted to know about my 500kHz activity! > In fact if you look at the WSPR.ORG website 500kHz is listed under=20 > "LF/VLF"! > > Juan has been actively reporting reception of 500kHz stations in the > US so I am hopeful that he is serious and will get on the air. > There have been any number of others who have applied for and been > issued a license and never got on the air for one reason or another. > > > --=20 > 73 Warren K2ORS > WD2XGJ > WD2XSH/23 > WE2XEB/2 > WE2XGR/1 > > > 2011/10/17 Stefan Sch=E4fer : >> Hi John, >> >> Interesting. That mail was written as if operation below 1.8 MHz would= be=20 >> a >> totally new thing :-) >> >> Do you know if it is actually 130 kHz or will they get the same range = as=20 >> we >> all have? >> >> >> From: "juangranados@bellsouth.net" >> Date: 16 October 2011 13:22:04 CEST >> To: SDR-IQ@yahoogroups.com >> Subject: [SDR-IQ] FCC issues Experimental License Grant WF2XXQ to oper= ate=20 >> on >> 130KC and 500KC bands >> Reply-To: SDR-IQ@yahoogroups.com >> >> 10.15.2011 - FCC issues Experimental License Grant WF2XXQ to operate o= n=20 >> the >> 130KC and 500KC bands to Licensed Radio Amateur Juan A. Granados /K4LC= D >> until 10.01.2016. >> >> As part of our VLF - Very Low Frequency amateur radio experiment, on >> September 6, 2011 we submitted an application for an Experimental Lice= nse=20 >> to >> operate within certain parameters in the 130KHz and 500KHz bands. >> >> 130 kHz =3D VLF??? >> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/spectrumusage.jpg >> >> 73, Stefan7DK7FC >> > >=20