Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mh03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id C3A5338000183; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 06:27:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1RDZXR-0002mn-Qg for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 11:26:21 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1RDZXR-0002md-Cn for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 11:26:21 +0100 Received: from imr-ma03.mx.aol.com ([64.12.206.41]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1RDZXO-0002bD-Ps for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 11:26:21 +0100 Received: from mtaomg-db05.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-db05.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.51.203]) by imr-ma03.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p9BAQ7lS009919 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 06:26:07 -0400 Received: from core-msc003b.r1000.mail.aol.com (core-msc003.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.29.233.201]) by mtaomg-db05.r1000.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id D978BE000088 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 06:26:06 -0400 (EDT) References: To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Markus Vester X-MB-Message-Type: User X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 34188-STANDARD Received: from 194.138.39.61 by webmail-d148.sysops.aol.com (149.174.18.38) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Tue, 11 Oct 2011 06:26:06 -0400 Message-Id: <8CE5617520C6335-3390-9A263@webmail-d148.sysops.aol.com> X-Originating-IP: [194.138.39.61] Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 06:26:06 -0400 (EDT) X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:402906912:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,FORGED_AOL_TAGS=0.281,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: XNS, XGJ, XES, XKO Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8CE56175226928C_3390_17052A_webmail-d148.sysops.aol.com" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_AOL_TAGS,HTML_30_40, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:453314656:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60d74e941a02035a X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ----------MB_8CE56175226928C_3390_17052A_webmail-d148.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Please keep in mind that when viewing QRSS modulated signal on the narrowba= nd display, we are only seeing the average voltage of the carrier component= , depending on the keying duty cycle (eg. -6 dB for 50% weight). In terms o= f power, 50% is saved, 25% goes to the carrier, and 25% to the keying sideb= ande. For the somewhat "lighter" callsigns (XNS and XES DFCW dots), the dif= ference is more like 8 to 10 dB, confirmed by their solid traces during ear= lier straight-carrier transmissions. Best 73, Markus (DF6NM) -----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung-----=20 Von: Markus Vester An: rsgb_lf_group Verschickt: Di, 11 Okt 2011 9:08 am Betreff: LF: XNS, XGJ, XES, XKO This morning, I was pleased to find good signals from XGJ and XKO in the "s= tandard" 21 mHz TA window. There were also faint carrier traces from XNS an= d XES in the slow 0.438 mHz FFT. =20 Thanks for providing the signals! =20 Best 73, Markus =20 (DF6NM in Nuernberg JN59NJ) http://www.alice-dsl.net/df6nm/grabber/Grabber.htm http://www.alice-dsl.net/df6nm/grabber/TAnarrow.jpg =20 =20 ----------MB_8CE56175226928C_3390_17052A_webmail-d148.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Please keep in mind that when viewing QRSS modulated signal on the nar= rowband display, we are only seeing the average voltage of the ca= rrier component, depending on the keying duty cycle (eg. -6 dB for 50%=  weight). In terms of power, 50% is saved, 25% goes to the carrie= r, and 25% to the keying sidebande. For the somewhat "lighter" callsig= ns (XNS and XES DFCW dots), the difference is more like 8 to 10 dB, co= nfirmed by their solid traces during earlier straight-carrier transmis= sions.
 
Best 73,
Markus (DF6NM)
= -----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: Markus Vester <markusvester@aol.com>
An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Verschickt: Di, 11 Okt 2011 9:08 am
Betreff: LF: XNS, XGJ, XES, XKO

This morning, I was pleased to find good&n= bsp;signals from XGJ and XKO in the "standard" 21 mHz TA window. = There were also faint carrier traces from XNS and XES in the slow 0.43= 8 mHz FFT.
 
Thanks for providing the signals!
 
Best 73,
Markus
 
(DF6NM in Nuernberg JN59NJ)
 
 

 ----------MB_8CE56175226928C_3390_17052A_webmail-d148.sysops.aol.com--