Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dd03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 299EF38000102; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:35:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1RGCc3-000505-K7 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:33:59 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1RGCc3-0004zw-8H for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:33:59 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1RGCc2-0005S7-RD for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:33:59 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p9IGXtM1005668 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 18:33:57 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id p9IFZux7005918 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:35:56 +0200 Message-ID: <4E9D9CA9.5050604@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:35:05 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4E99EA7C.5080200@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4E9C2CB9.3040303@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4E9C71B1.9010306@legal-medicine.de> <4E9C74DE.5090407@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <00fc01cc8d21$dc5fba00$4001a8c0@lark> In-Reply-To: <00fc01cc8d21$dc5fba00$4001a8c0@lark> X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: LF reflector, since? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:337653824:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408f4e9daabd7a35 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Alan :-) Am 18.10.2011 00:16, schrieb Alan Melia: > Hi Stefan what was even "cooler" is that we were told quite firmly by the > "know it alls" that we would not get a signal out of our back gardens with 1 > watt!! Hehe i know ;-) Some reported to me from the early days, like DF8ZR, that this was the opinion of some in the beginning... > Does that sound familiar?? Hmmmm, maybe it was in February 2010? ;-) Then it was 857 km with 1.8 mW ;-) > I was a "Johney come lately" I only joined > in the reflector in 2000 though I did experiment on 73kHz earlier, though I > could never hear anything there for the local noise. Oh, a pity. I would like to try on 73 kHz with the 300m vertical and 500W in CW :-) > My special permission > (NoV) has gone into my "museum" :-)) > If 73 kHz would be allocated to you still, what do you expect about the activity there, now? 73, Stefan/DK7FC