Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dc03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id DB0F038000085; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 03:54:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1RDX9T-00029r-4b for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 08:53:27 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1RDX9S-00029i-N4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 08:53:26 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1RDX9R-0001be-CJ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 08:53:26 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p9B7rNFn016026 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 09:53:24 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id p9B7rOhN020676 for ; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 09:53:24 +0200 Message-ID: <4E93F5C6.7070507@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 09:52:38 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4E91694C.8060900@orange.fr> <4E9169AD.8090609@wanadoo.fr> <4E918C0E.30401@freenet.de> <4E918FF1.1010407@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <1318166502.15085.YahooMailNeo@web28106.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <1849736542-1318171189-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-208700020-@b1.c11.bise7.blackberry> <4E920BBA.9040200@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4E934A40.9040204@gmx.de> <006c01cc87ab$427234c0$4001a8c0@lark> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: VX9MRC QRV 507.77 kHz/ Arcing relays &c. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:500746912:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40834e93f62f1153 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Joe, Maybe you can switch a series LC circuit which is resonant at 1850 kHz parallel to the 0.2 mH coil? For example 200 pF/37uH. You must then re-adjust the 0.2mH coil a bit. Can be calculated or done in an experimental way ;-) Then it would run without a relay. But do you really have 50 kV on that 200uH coil at 500 (137) kHz? That would mean 80 (290) A antenna current...? 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 11.10.2011 03:11, schrieb jcraig@mun.ca: > Hi Alan, Group. > > Thank-you for the reply. Multiple contacts in series were > considered... but the gap has to > increase by orders magnitude! How much gap will I need for 50 kV? > > Your spiral pie story was most enlightening. My pies are ~35 turns of > 4mm litz about 37 cm diameter with L=0.24 mH. A stack of 4 yields > 3mH. Each pie has ~23 metres of litz. Do you think this is will give > the most L for the least length of litz? > > VX9MRC is still sending the 8 WPM beacon as yours truly looks at a fried > relay... > > Cheers > Joe > > On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Alan Melia wrote: > >> Hi Joe, why not stick two sets of normal contacts in >> series....doubles the >> gap :-)) >> >> Alan >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: >> To: >> Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 11:54 PM >> Subject: Re: LF: VX9MRC QRV 507.77 kHz/ Arcing relays &c. >> >> >>> Hello Hartmut, Group. >>> >>> Good to hear from you again, Hartmut. Thank-you for the report. >>> >>> The beacon is on again, but there was some trouble: to use the tower >>> on 160m the 500 kHz tuning coil (0.2 mH) is shorted by a relay. The >>> N.O. contacts on this relay arced over. Perhaps a high voltage >>> (vacuum) >>> relay would help? >>> >>> This problem will be much worse on 137.777 kHz with the higher >>> voltage. >>> I have some spiral wound 4mm (Decca) litz to make up the 3 mH for that >>> project. (The spiral winding was inspired by G3NYK's experiments with >>> tuning coils on his web page.) >>> >>> 73 >>> Joe >>> >>> On Mon, 10 Oct 2011, Hartmut Wolff wrote: >>> >>>> Am 2011-10-09 23:50, wrote jcraig@mun.ca: >>>>> Dear Group, >>>>> Reports on the 8 WPM CW beacon will be appreciated! >>>>> 73 >>>>> Joe VO1NA >>>> >>>> Attached a screenshot of the 8wpm signal. The signal came up at about >> 23:20 >>>> and faded out at about 7:35. The strongest part was between >>>> 04:00-06:00 >> UTC >>>> -- >>>> 73 >>>> Hartmut >>>> www.h-wolff.de >>>> Locator: JO52hp >>>> >>> >>> This electronic communication is governed by the terms and >>> conditions at >>> >> http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2011.php >> >>> >> >> >> > > This electronic communication is governed by the terms and conditions at > http://www.mun.ca/cc/policies/electronic_communications_disclaimer_2011.php >