Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-md04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id A18FA38000091; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 19:34:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1RBaxq-0007TM-4M for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 00:33:26 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1RBaxp-0007TD-IA for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 00:33:25 +0100 Received: from imr-ma03.mx.aol.com ([64.12.206.41]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1RBaxn-0008D7-AO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 00:33:25 +0100 Received: from mtaout-da04.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaout-da04.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.51.132]) by imr-ma03.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p95NXGe4012952 for ; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 19:33:16 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.68] (host-92-6-236-249.as43234.net [92.6.236.249]) by mtaout-da04.r1000.mx.aol.com (MUA/Third Party Client Interface) with ESMTPA id 3D52DE000098 for ; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 19:33:15 -0400 (EDT) From: g4gvw To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <000d01cc83aa$41c1ca40$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> References: <00d101cc8385$36ca2c10$4001a8c0@lark> <96322D70F9974098BE3BAD32EC55648F@AGB> <1317850793.4144.27.camel@pat-compaq-evo> <000d01cc83aa$41c1ca40$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 00:33:08 +0100 Message-ID: <1317857588.4715.4.camel@pat-compaq-evo> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:448318656:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: Re: RSGB Convention MF side looks a bit thin ?? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:462883136:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60584e8ce97232d4 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Ahh! Well, Mal but we still differ! I prefer the term Radio Experimenter. "Operation" is an experimental science too! 73 On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 21:55 +0000, mal hamilton wrote: > Everyone agrees with me sooner or later, it's just some are slower than > others to admit it !! > Maybe there ought to be two conventions, one for Radio Operators and one for > Appliance Operators. > G3KEV > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "g4gvw" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 9:39 PM > Subject: Re: LF: Re: RSGB Convention MF side looks a bit thin ?? > > > > Actually Andy, I've just had an exchange of emails with my mate Alan > > 3nyk (near neighbour) in which I have mooted the idea that maybe now is > > the time for a realignment of the Royal Surrey Gas Board. Membership is > > falling, my guess is that this is proportionate to 'genuine' amateur > > activity and that a realignment into organisations, some of which might > > be absorbed or merged into other technical or scientific bodies. This > > might seem sacraligeous (gosh, can't even spell the word) to some but I > > cannot feel that experimental and developmental aspects are best served > > by the status quo! > > > > Having had to deal with the "powers that be" in a professional context, > > I cannot believe they are, any more, convinced that "QSL Card Bashing" > > is any more than a sport carried out by "appliance operators" (see, I'm > > not always at loggerheads with Mal hi.) The modern "appliance" radio > > rarely requires a huge amount of "self-training". Those ops who don't > > have the technical "nous" to adapt to modes and frequencies that cannot > > be bought "off the shelf" tend to be just what Mal calls "appliance > > operators". > > > > Ok I'm now an "old fogey" but I'd far rather count frequency than > > countries and squares (been there, done that). > > > > I bet that if Maxwell were still around today, he'd have had a callsign! > > > > But, he wouldn't have been chasing squares! > > > > > > 73 > > > > > > On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 21:19 +0100, Andy Talbot wrote: > > > A few years ago, the convention and all RSGB activity was so HF > > > orientated us technolgists and microwavers were alienated. At long > > > last everything has been equalised and the conventions merged, so > > > technology and techniques for the whole spectrum can be covered for > > > all. > > > > > > Did anyone offer any LF / MF talks ? > > > > > > Andy > > > www.g4jnt.com > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5 October 2011 18:56, Graham wrote: > > > True but looks like the fast-food gang are slowly > > > taking over !..An Inevitability of combining the HF > > > and VHF shows I suppose.. > > > > > > Coupled to a lack of solar activity that depressed > > > the HF band occupancy .. > > > > > > G.. > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > From: "Alan Melia" > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 6:33 PM > > > To: > > > Subject: LF: Re: RSGB Convention MF side looks a bit > > > thin ?? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think it's like all these things Graham......it > > > depends what papers are > > > offered. If no-one offers any lectures you dont get a > > > stream. > > > > > > Alan > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Graham" > > > > > > To: > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 5:30 PM > > > Subject: LF: RSGB Convention MF side looks a bit > > > thin ?? > > > > > > > > > RSGB Convention MF side looks a bit thin ?? Is > > > there a real HF/ > > > MF/LF convention anywhere ?? > > > > > > Dave's 45 min slot on the Sunday looks to be > > > 'it' ? > > > > > > Don't mind mini-waves ... just a bit like > > > being at work over the > > > weekend .. ! > > > > > > G.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > 73 es gd dx de pat g4gvw > > qth nr felixstowe uk > > (east coast, county of suffolk) > > > > > > -- 73 es gd dx de pat g4gvw qth nr felixstowe uk (east coast, county of suffolk)