Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-me04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id E4A33380000F8; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 17:41:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1RBZCP-0006Li-Og for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 22:40:21 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1RBZCP-0006LZ-2N for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 22:40:21 +0100 Received: from imr-db01.mx.aol.com ([205.188.91.95]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1RBZCN-0007Md-9A for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2011 22:40:21 +0100 Received: from mtaout-da01.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaout-da01.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.51.129]) by imr-db01.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p95Le9Hi005658 for ; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 17:40:09 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.68] (host-92-6-236-249.as43234.net [92.6.236.249]) by mtaout-da01.r1000.mx.aol.com (MUA/Third Party Client Interface) with ESMTPA id 1F226E0000FF for ; Wed, 5 Oct 2011 17:40:08 -0400 (EDT) From: g4gvw To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: References: <00d101cc8385$36ca2c10$4001a8c0@lark> <96322D70F9974098BE3BAD32EC55648F@AGB> Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 22:39:53 +0100 Message-ID: <1317850793.4144.27.camel@pat-compaq-evo> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:440135936:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: Re: RSGB Convention MF side looks a bit thin ?? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:459694464:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d608c4e8ccf1b4158 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Actually Andy, I've just had an exchange of emails with my mate Alan 3nyk (near neighbour) in which I have mooted the idea that maybe now is the time for a realignment of the Royal Surrey Gas Board. Membership is falling, my guess is that this is proportionate to 'genuine' amateur activity and that a realignment into organisations, some of which might be absorbed or merged into other technical or scientific bodies. This might seem sacraligeous (gosh, can't even spell the word) to some but I cannot feel that experimental and developmental aspects are best served by the status quo! Having had to deal with the "powers that be" in a professional context, I cannot believe they are, any more, convinced that "QSL Card Bashing" is any more than a sport carried out by "appliance operators" (see, I'm not always at loggerheads with Mal hi.) The modern "appliance" radio rarely requires a huge amount of "self-training". Those ops who don't have the technical "nous" to adapt to modes and frequencies that cannot be bought "off the shelf" tend to be just what Mal calls "appliance operators". Ok I'm now an "old fogey" but I'd far rather count frequency than countries and squares (been there, done that). I bet that if Maxwell were still around today, he'd have had a callsign! But, he wouldn't have been chasing squares! 73 On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 21:19 +0100, Andy Talbot wrote: > A few years ago, the convention and all RSGB activity was so HF > orientated us technolgists and microwavers were alienated. At long > last everything has been equalised and the conventions merged, so > technology and techniques for the whole spectrum can be covered for > all. > > Did anyone offer any LF / MF talks ? > > Andy > www.g4jnt.com > > > > On 5 October 2011 18:56, Graham wrote: > True but looks like the fast-food gang are slowly > taking over !..An Inevitability of combining the HF > and VHF shows I suppose.. > > Coupled to a lack of solar activity that depressed > the HF band occupancy .. > > G.. > > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Alan Melia" > Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 6:33 PM > To: > Subject: LF: Re: RSGB Convention MF side looks a bit > thin ?? > > > > > I think it's like all these things Graham......it > depends what papers are > offered. If no-one offers any lectures you dont get a > stream. > > Alan > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Graham" > > To: > Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 5:30 PM > Subject: LF: RSGB Convention MF side looks a bit > thin ?? > > > RSGB Convention MF side looks a bit thin ?? Is > there a real HF/ > MF/LF convention anywhere ?? > > Dave's 45 min slot on the Sunday looks to be > 'it' ? > > Don't mind mini-waves ... just a bit like > being at work over the > weekend .. ! > > G.. > > > > > > > > -- 73 es gd dx de pat g4gvw qth nr felixstowe uk (east coast, county of suffolk)