Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-df03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 5217638000311; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 14:24:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1R1MnA-0000sC-HD for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 19:24:08 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1R1MnA-0000s3-51 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 19:24:08 +0100 Received: from mail16.primus.ca ([216.254.141.183] helo=mail-10.primus.ca) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1R1Mn8-0003Mc-K5 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 19:24:08 +0100 Received: from dyn-dsl-bb-98-124-1-94.nrtco.net ([98.124.1.94] helo=Bigmachine.magma.ca) by mail-10.primus.ca with esmtpa (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1R1Mn6-0002zo-2F for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 14:24:04 -0400 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 14:24:27 -0400 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: Bill de Carle In-Reply-To: <4E67AF85.7000002@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> References: <4E6695F9.8060402@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4E6727E8.5040508@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4E676569.5030207@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4E6776EC.8090202@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4E67989F.9040000@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4E67AF85.7000002@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Authenticated: ve2iq - dyn-dsl-bb-98-124-1-94.nrtco.net (Bigmachine.magma.ca) [98.124.1.94] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Message-Id: Subject: Re: LF: beaconing to the west II ...and to the east, north and south... Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:466752000:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40d74e67b6ef4600 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Stefan: Just to be sure everything was OK, I transmitted (using a ferrite rod Tx antenna!) a marker at 136170.000 Hz and to my surprise, it showed up on your version about half a Hz low! I had not entered a close estimate for the 48000 sampling rate and apparently SL locked onto something else? I measured the actual sample rate at 48000.10944, entered that and thereafter the displayed line jumped right up to 136.170 Khz. My usr uses 22050 (which is actually 22200.0653), but I had already typed that in last night. I'm not sure how Windows XP handles things when two applications are inputting simultaneously using different sample rates. At this time both instances have the sampling rate correction enabled and the TS-850 is still set for CW mode 500 Hz narrow filter - that's the way your .usr file assumed it. At some point while I was measuring things SL appeared to redraw the LF_EU60 display and now both versions show the marker on the same frequency. Almost as if the two versions were comparing notes :-) I'll either take the marker away or turn it off if Mal wants to use that freq. I am using V2.77 b02 of Spectrum Lab for this test. 73, Bill VE2IQ At 01:53 PM 9/7/2011, Stefan wrote: >Thanks Bill ;-) The webpage looks fine! :-) > >At G4WGT i can see Mal TXing nearly 136.172. Will he join in? Oh, it >seems i really have to finish that PA supply ;-) >Looking forward to that evening! Unfortunately there will be some >rain it seems. That may cost a dB or so...