Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-me01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id E7426380000B2; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 07:35:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Qz5Xy-0008WD-8W for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 12:35:02 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Qz5Xx-0008W4-JP for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 12:35:01 +0100 Received: from mail-bw0-f43.google.com ([209.85.214.43]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Qz5Xu-0004sU-IR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 12:35:01 +0100 Received: by bkbzv15 with SMTP id zv15so2541610bkb.16 for ; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 04:34:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=6/kaufT+tCgw1kU0TT2RX4vNR9sPLnqowq/0s4w8qew=; b=UYO4g3bahFtArF4mDJpaO9TzMSL2qp7Do9wlK7kTEtBXbRgE87Awv+ahvLoJwVeupT lSuTjl7GqKhRu/zGiDzsGhEwm8re7ufOyB8jmGagoDsYoLHX8ggSkU+jLsuLQ9BnENst CZy/l4W9q3VKRw0MHWuvteSq0DRgI7yjVLdRo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.130.138 with SMTP id t10mr939514bks.10.1314876890551; Thu, 01 Sep 2011 04:34:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.115.83 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 04:34:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8CE361FAE73E427-1140-27A35@webmail-d177.sysops.aol.com> References: <8CE361FAE73E427-1140-27A35@webmail-d177.sysops.aol.com> Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 13:34:50 +0200 Message-ID: From: Chris 4X1RF To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: Re: Microhertzing at LF: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015173fe848fc16dc04abdfa1da X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:470506176:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m259.2 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60894e5f6e1b7033 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --0015173fe848fc16dc04abdfa1da Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Markus, LF, As a newcomer to LF I find this as an interesting experiment for real low power or long distance tests for those who can achieve the necessary frequency stability requirements. I found this to be quite a challenge... I have followed your initiative and started similar windows on my grabbers in YO: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/10280270/YO/TA3600.jpg and 4X: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/10280270/4X/TA3600.jpg The 4X grabber is currently using the Mercury HPSDR receiver ( http://openhpsdr.org) which is GPSDO locked. However, the audio is routed to SpectrumLab using Virtual Audio Cable as a virtual sound card. I have no info regarding VAC sample rate accuracy or how I can automatically adjust it so this may be a limiting factor, further experimentation is needed. In the worst case, a real sound card could be used but then it also has to be locked to GPS. The YO grabber is usually using GQD as a reference for the sound card sample rate calibration in SpectrumLab and the LF receiver is based on a laboratory grade VTCXO. GQD being off air, I was forced to use DHO which is not very reliable during the night for me as can be seen on the 137.775 Loran line. Thanks for the challenge! 73s Chris 4X1RF On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Markus Vester wrote: > Dear LF, > > inspired by the very fruitful narrowband weak-signal detections on VLF, I > have set up a temporary LF spectrogram, using Rubidium locked oscillators > and a 0.438 mHz FFT bandwidth > http://www.alice-dsl.net/df6nm/grabber/TAnarrow.jpg > (updated every two hours). > > Frequency: > The receive band is currently 7 Hz wide around 137777.5 Hz, within which > the visible display slots can be shifted around a posteriori on request. At > the moment I'm showing two slots around European Loran lines > 137778.3705 Hz (GRI 7499 from Sylt and Lessay), > 137775.0000 (GRI 8000 from Slonim and Simferopol). > I chose the TA slot for the availability of other grabbers, but maybe a > dedicated ultra-narrowband slot (eg. 10 MHz/73 = 136986.301 Hz) would be a > better option - suggestions welcome! > > Sensitivity: > Compared to my own 21 mHz TA grabber, the bandwidth reduction should > provide a 17 dB reduction of noise, or 11 dB versus Argo-120 at 5.3 mHz. Of > course you will need to transmit a much longer dash (eg. one hour instead of > one minute) with good frequency stability. A GPS- or Rubidium-derived > carrier would be the best option, but a good 1e-9 class OCXO would work just > as well. > > Groundwave: > In quiet daytime conditions, a radiated power of only 10 nanowatts should > be able produce 10 dB SNR. This could be achieved by sending 5.5 mA up a > whip at 1 m effective height! Or perhaps even from Lubos' ferrite antenna in > TX mode? > > Skywave: > During a few nights in Februrary 2006, John W1TAG transmitted GPS > controlled straight and 15-minute phase-cycled carriers. Receptions in > Europe by G3PLX and myself revealed long periods of stable skywaves, well > suited for sub-millihertz analysis. Some details and spectrograms can be > found in > http://df6nm.bplaced.net/LF/slow_psk/ > > Now I hope to see some really feeble signals soon... > > Best 73, > Markus (DF6NM) > > > > > --0015173fe848fc16dc04abdfa1da Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Markus, LF,

As a newcomer to LF I find this as an i= nteresting experiment for real low power or long distance tests for those w= ho can achieve the necessary frequency stability requirements. I found this= to be quite a challenge...

I have followed your initiative and started similar windows on my grabb= ers in YO: http:= //dl.dropbox.com/u/10280270/YO/TA3600.jpg and 4X: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/10280270/4X/T= A3600.jpg

The 4X grabber is currently using the Mercury HPSDR receiver (http://openhpsdr.org) which is GPSDO locked. = However, the audio is routed to SpectrumLab using Virtual Audio Cable as a = virtual sound card. I have no info regarding VAC sample rate accuracy or ho= w I can automatically adjust it so this may be a limiting factor, further e= xperimentation is needed. In the worst case, a real sound card could be use= d but then it also has to be locked to GPS.

The YO grabber is usually using GQD as a reference for the sound card s= ample rate calibration in SpectrumLab and the LF receiver is based on a lab= oratory grade VTCXO. GQD being off air, I was forced to use DHO which is no= t very reliable during the night for me as can be seen on the 137.775 Loran= line.

Thanks for the challenge!


73s
Chris 4X1RF



= =A0


On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 8:05 PM,= Markus Vester <markusvester@aol.com> wrote:
Dear LF,
=A0
inspired by the very fruitful narrowband weak-signal detections on VLF= , I have set up a temporary LF spectrogram, using Rubidium locked oscillato= rs and a 0.438 mHz FFT bandwidth
=A0http://www.alice-dsl.net/df6nm/grabber/TAnarrow.jpg
(updated every two hours).
=A0
Frequency:
The receive band is currently 7 Hz wide around 137777.5 Hz, within which th= e visible display slots can be shifted around a posteriori on request. At t= he moment I'm showing two slots around European Loran lines
=A0137778.3705 Hz (GRI 7499 from Sylt and Lessay),
=A0137775.0000 (GRI 8000 from Slonim and Simferopol).
I chose the TA slot for the availability of other grabbers, but maybe a ded= icated ultra-narrowband slot (eg. 10 MHz/73 =3D 136986.301 Hz) would be a b= etter option - suggestions welcome!
=A0
Sensitivity:
Compared to my own 21 mHz TA grabber, the bandwidth reduction should provid= e a 17 dB reduction of noise, or 11 dB versus Argo-120 at 5.3 mHz. Of cours= e you will need to transmit a much longer dash (eg. one hour instead of one= minute) with good frequency stability. A GPS- or Rubidium-derived carrier = would be the best option, but a good 1e-9 class OCXO would work just as wel= l.
=A0
Groundwave:
In quiet daytime conditions, a radiated power of only 10 nanowatts should b= e able produce 10 dB SNR. This could be achieved by sending 5.5 mA up a whi= p at 1 m effective height! Or perhaps even from Lubos' ferrite antenna = in TX mode?
=A0
Skywave:
During a few nights in Februrary 2006, John W1TAG transmitted GPS controlle= d straight and 15-minute phase-cycled carriers. Receptions in Europe by G3P= LX and myself revealed long periods of stable skywaves, well suited for sub= -millihertz analysis. Some details and spectrograms can be found in
http://= df6nm.bplaced.net/LF/slow_psk/
=A0
Now I hope to see some really feeble signals soon...
=A0
Best 73,
Markus (DF6NM)



=A0

--0015173fe848fc16dc04abdfa1da--