Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-me04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id F38C538000092; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 15:28:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1QzZP4-0007ay-Tg for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 20:27:50 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1QzZP4-0007ap-DX for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 20:27:50 +0100 Received: from mail-qy0-f171.google.com ([209.85.216.171]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QzZP1-00079r-PZ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 20:27:50 +0100 Received: by qyk36 with SMTP id 36so1069626qyk.16 for ; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 12:27:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=0UtmfTEYDYd+8vWkjo2++//oiImtebD0JOYrsr20q94=; b=FAgBJsvriQqr8ChV1JaWD0fwXsRu6bDSPLqKfrQIq2ft1hzOlnbIRDTDt49pLbDsDJ NuJcMhwgZwLZvLXZn4qG9SlBhN+U0t8IM3y2cFjBm2Og5t2MlBdcQlwyhVGkeI+xm6S0 pBe71V/NM3yz1GQal9F8NGnlrGXGRt1h0Z4z8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.236.10 with SMTP id ki10mr1062788qcb.252.1314991661340; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 12:27:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.84.15 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 12:27:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <009e01cc699e$c53c14a0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> References: <001201cc6943$47f18e40$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <4E608A57.7080400@telus.net> <008e01cc6994$8c75fa00$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <009e01cc699e$c53c14a0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 20:27:41 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: T0-WBbEytV9G4Hyza1vK5zP92p0 Message-ID: From: Gary - G4WGT To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR=0.276 Subject: Re: LF: ROS Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64cc52adb5df004abfa5abe X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:477829184:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m208.2 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d608c4e612e644736 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none --0016e64cc52adb5df004abfa5abe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 OK Mal, Now I see you point. I once had the same/similar problem not able to decode strong signals. The setting of the Rx volume (sound card level) should be set on the VU (volume) meter to be 4 to 5 dB, that's in the last green segment next to the red one. After I had made that adjustment there is no problen decoding even signals buried in the noise. I hope that helps if you wish to try ROS again. Gary - G4WGT. On 2 September 2011 19:33, mal hamilton wrote: > ** > I understand, but I was not. Considering the volume of signals visible at > my QTH, but I did copy one complete line from the GM station, who was > probably the weakest, also as pointed out I kept getting via the internet > other freqs and acty that I did not want. > The prog also crashed 3 times, not the PC. It does not look attractive. I > was able to see all the signals active on the waterfall and had it been qrs > 3 I could have copied all of the information instead of waiting and waiting > and nothing happened > Others are are also critical about this mode on LF es MF > Why did I copy one station and not the others especially the strong ones ? > mal/g3kev > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Gary - G4WGT > *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > *Sent:* Friday, September 02, 2011 7:20 PM > *Subject:* Re: LF: ROS > > Mal, > > Did you mis-understand ? > > I was getting 100% decodes from Finbar & John even though there was no > audible or visual signal. > > Cheers, Gary - G4WGT. > > > On 2 September 2011 18:20, mal hamilton wrote: > >> ** >> You have just verified what I have always said. >> Yes keep an open mind and experiment but in the end all will come to the >> same conclusion as Yourself. >> QRSS/DFCW. >> Over the years I have had a multitude of private emails saying the same >> thing. We are not alone !! >> de g3kev >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> *From:* Scott Tilley >> *To:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >> *Sent:* Friday, September 02, 2011 8:48 AM >> *Subject:* Re: LF: ROS >> >> On 9/2/2011 12:38 AM, mal hamilton wrote: >> >> While it is interesting to experiment with different modes >> >> Mal is this really you? >> >> I agree with you on the QRSS/DFCW comment! >> >> >> > --0016e64cc52adb5df004abfa5abe Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable OK Mal,

Now I see you point.

I = once had the same/similar problem not able to decode strong signals. The se= tting of the Rx volume (sound card level) should be set on the VU (volume) = meter to be 4 to 5 dB, that's in the last green segment next to the red= one. After I had made that adjustment there is no problen decoding even si= gnals buried in the noise.

I hope that helps if you wish to try ROS again.

Gary - G4WGT.


On 2 September 2011 19:33, mal hamilton <g3kevmal@talktalk.net> wrote:
I understand, but I was not.=A0=A0Considering the= =20 volume of signals visible=A0at my QTH, but I did copy one complete line fro= m=20 the GM station, who was probably the weakest, also as pointed out I kept ge= tting=20 via the internet other freqs and acty that I did not want.
The prog also crashed 3 times, not the PC. It doe= s not=20 look attractive. I was able to see all the signals active on the waterfall = and=20 had it been qrs 3 I could have copied all of the information instead of wai= ting=20 and waiting and nothing happened
Others are are also critical about this mode on L= F es=20 MF
Why did I copy one station and not the others esp= ecially=20 the strong ones ?
mal/g3kev
=A0
=A0
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Gary -=20 G4WGT
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 7:20=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: ROS

Mal,

Did you mis-understand ?

I was getting 100% decodes from Finbar & John even though there = was=20 no audible or visual signal.

Cheers, Gary - G4WGT.


On 2 September 2011 18:20, mal hamilton <= g3kevmal@talktalk.net>=20 wrote:
You have just verified what I have always=20 said.
Yes keep an open mind and experiment but in t= he end=20 all will come to the same conclusion as Yourself.
QRSS/DFCW.
Over the years I have had a multitude of priv= ate=20 emails saying the same thing. We are not alone !!
de g3kev
=A0
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, September 02, 201= 1 8:48=20 AM
Subject: Re: LF: ROS

On 9/2/2011 12:38 AM, mal hamilton wrote:=20
While it is interestin= g to=20 experiment with different modes
Mal is thi= s=20 really you?

I agree with you on the QRSS/DFCW=20 comment!




--0016e64cc52adb5df004abfa5abe--