Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-df06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 9624E38000123; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 17:30:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1R91hE-0001Sn-52 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 22:29:40 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1R91hD-0001Se-Pq for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 22:29:39 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1R91hC-0007t8-Ck for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 22:29:39 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p8SLTb5r022313 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 23:29:37 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id p8SLTbvu007739 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 23:29:37 +0200 Message-ID: <4E8391A2.4000300@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 23:29:06 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: LF: 17 or 19 or 21 inch? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:345101888:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40da4e8391ea3097 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none LF, VLF, Would like to hear some opinions about the best width of a grabber window. Currently all my windows are optimised for a xxx*1024 pixel monitor. This is suitable for the most monitors. But since many years the standard seems to be 19 inch or even more. Furthermore the 16:9 format becomes normality. I think about extending the window sizes of the grabber captures to a 19 inch format, like G4WGT runs them. This may be a bit nerving if a smaller monitor is used but allows a better overview on the wide screens. What do you think is the best width of the windows? 73, Stefan/DK7FC