Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-de02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id C4BB83800008D; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 06:58:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1R4W7F-0003d6-VY for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 11:57:53 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1R4W7F-0003cx-JM for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 11:57:53 +0100 Received: from mailt.toya.net.pl ([217.113.224.9] ident=postfix) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1R4W7D-0000Uo-GN for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 11:57:53 +0100 Received: from mail.toya.net.pl (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.toya.net.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E4CC20000816 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:57:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.toya.net.pl (Postfix, from userid 5001) id 42F1B20000808; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:57:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.101] (unknown [10.3.153.39]) (Authenticated sender: unimlyn@toya.net.pl) by mail.toya.net.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 42BC920000816 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:57:48 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E732BAC.4060204@toya.net.pl> Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:57:48 +0200 From: Piotr Mlynarski User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; pl; rv:1.9.2.22) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/3.1.14 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4E7275A5.7040204@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4E729468.3090908@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: <4E729468.3090908@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: QRN in the west? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: S X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:413725664:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-AOL-REROUTE: YES x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40ca4e732bd85353 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none W dniu 2011-09-16 02:12, Stefan Sch=E4fer pisze: > Bill, Dex, > > Decided to TX anyway, starting at 3 UTC, repeating 2x my call. That=20 > was arround the best time during Bill's last reception of my signal.=20 > For Dex it may be a bit later (?), thus 2x. > Hi Stefan, LF Group last night i had my radio gear off but the previous night my grabber =20 at 136.172 kHz has been switched on and i also made some auto screen=20 saves. Two of them in a sequence: http://www.toya.net.pl/~mlynarski/capt05.jpg http://www.toya.net.pl/~mlynarski/capt06.jpg show that, indeed, the best time for RX ( read: possible qso) was=20 betwwen 03 - 04 UTC Of course, it is my "one -time" observation , however, it fully=20 confirms the long terrm observations made by Mal, g3kev and stated in=20 one of his recent mails that this part of european night is a good one for possible dx operation at LF Also , the relatively high S/N at qrss-60 speed indicates that it can be=20 changed into higher speeds , say "30' or even '10' - sure, it will =20 decrease S/N but not that much making decoding impossible but , at the same time, allowing for full exchange=20 of callsigns etc... assuming it must be fitted in , say,one hour, =20 timeslot. = = 73, Piotr, sq7mpj