Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dl03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id EEB1538000096; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 06:20:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1R2Kew-00057N-K9 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 11:19:38 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1R2Kew-00057E-7f for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 11:19:38 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1R2Kev-00049N-5V for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 11:19:38 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p8AAJZ9U013809 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 12:19:36 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id p8AAJZUw003336 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 12:19:35 +0200 Message-ID: <4E6B39A9.3020204@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 12:19:21 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4E6B301F.3000802@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <464F4937AE664E8AA5869E5FB3207048@JimPC> In-Reply-To: <464F4937AE664E8AA5869E5FB3207048@JimPC> X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: Re: M0BMU / DD7PC / DK7FC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:503955968:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d4ad14e6b39eb6365 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hello Jim, Ok, thanks for the info. Yes, have seen that 137.7 is on a DCF sideband, unfortunately... And my backgound noise here in the city is quite disappointing. Have to work on the /p station, i.e. the UHF handheld TRX. The automatic variometer is another important step. And i shall add some kind of second PTT from the RS232, to enable the UHF link keying from remote. Then i can set the QRG (from 136.172) to 136.5 and the variometer automatically turns to resonance. Then enabling the UHF link and so i do not need to drive to the institute to enable the system for /p use. All could be done from home then and i can start with the bike to a quiet location. This will be done soon, so that there can be plenty of CW contacts for me in the quiet season which starts now... Thanks for calling/trying! Cu soon. 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 10.09.2011 12:03, schrieb James Moritz: > Dear Stefan, Marco, LF Group, > > Yes... I started calling CQ on 137650Hz and then saw DD7PC ("M" copy) > and replied, but perhaps Marco uses a narrower spectrogram window than > I do... The reason for this frequency was that there is a null in the > amplitude of DCF39's sidebands at about 137.64kHz, so received SNR is > considerably better at this slightly lower frequency - Marco would > have been "O" copy if he was using the lower frequency. > > I also heard DK7FC RST 559 working DD7PC (not audible) on 136.5kHz. I > tried calling in CW also, but apparently the noise level is too high. > > Cheers, Jim Moritz > 73 de M0BMU