Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-dd02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 47662380000FF; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 10:33:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1R2284-0001hI-W8 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 15:32:28 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1R2284-0001h9-FE for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 15:32:28 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1R2283-00017L-4P for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 15:32:28 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p89EWP5G028776 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 16:32:26 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id p89EWPIm008983 for ; Fri, 9 Sep 2011 16:32:25 +0200 Message-ID: <4E6A236B.5090204@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 16:32:11 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4E6695F9.8060402@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4E6727E8.5040508@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4E676569.5030207@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4E6776EC.8090202@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4E67989F.9040000@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4E67AF85.7000002@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <009101cc6db5$d1702e80$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <000401cc6dbb$346a10a0$8d01a8c0@JAYDELL> <00a701cc6dbc$75bd20f0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <4E687478.5050403@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4E68A33A.80905@charter.net> <4E68A687.5040606@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: Re: 136.172 T/A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:443046176:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408e4e6a23c15d83 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Wow, thank you very much indeed, Bill!! Congratulations to you too! Very glad about that. This is my best DX so far from the fixed antenna! QRB is 6075 km http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/DK7FC_to_VE2IQ.png Hope i gets not boring for you now to go on. Just worth the fun :-) There can be significant changes in noise and propagation between two nights so this shows me it is always worth to try even if the times are actually not so promising. We should think about trying QRSS-30 or QRSS-10 in some time!? And VLF! :-) About the different SL settings, there seems to be not much difference. It's to the personal taste which spectrogram is better readable. I find the faster scrolling spectrogram better, especially if S/N is good or if QRSS-30 is transmitted to, like Mal did. Traces at lower S/N are maybe a bit better readable... Best 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 09.09.2011 07:21, schrieb Bill de Carle: > Congratulations Stefan, your full callsign made it across! > > http://www.nrtco.net/~ve2iq/grabs/fullcall.jpg > http://www.nrtco.net/~ve2iq/grabs/capt43.jpg > > 73, > Bill VE2IQ >