Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-me03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 53EB438000189; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 03:54:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1R1ZQe-0001BM-7P for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2011 08:53:44 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1R1ZQd-0001BD-SK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2011 08:53:43 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1R1ZQc-0002k2-CJ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2011 08:53:43 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p887red0021341 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 09:53:41 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id p887reeV020639 for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 09:53:40 +0200 Message-ID: <4E687478.5050403@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 09:53:28 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4E6695F9.8060402@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4E6727E8.5040508@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4E676569.5030207@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4E6776EC.8090202@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4E67989F.9040000@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4E67AF85.7000002@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <009101cc6db5$d1702e80$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <000401cc6dbb$346a10a0$8d01a8c0@JAYDELL> <00a701cc6dbc$75bd20f0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: Re: 136.172 T/A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:479731392:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d608b4e6874b51b3f X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Bill, Not sure which FFT settings Argo uses for QRSS-60. These should be equal to be compared. Usually Argo uses smaller FFT bandwidths, maybe something arround 10...15 mHz? Someone can comment, perhaps... 73, Stefan Am 08.09.2011 02:22, schrieb Bill de Carle: > I just started up an ARGO screen using the same input signal. I'd > like to compare ARGO vs Spectrum Lab and also my QTH here vs Jay's QTH > nearer the ocean. I'll post the ARGO screens later. > > Bill VE2IQ