Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mh03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 32953380005D0; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 14:41:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1R1N2w-00035k-2j for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 19:40:26 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1R1N2v-00035X-Dy for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 19:40:25 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1R1N2p-0004QF-DD for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 19:40:25 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p87IeI1J025688 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 20:40:18 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id p87IeIlr030354 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 20:40:18 +0200 Message-ID: <4E67BA86.80204@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 20:40:06 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4E6695F9.8060402@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4E6727E8.5040508@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4E676569.5030207@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4E6776EC.8090202@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4E67989F.9040000@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4E67AF85.7000002@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: beaconing to the west II ...and to the east, north and south... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:484351552:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60d74e67bac849d3 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Bill, Am 07.09.2011 20:24, schrieb Bill de Carle: > Stefan: > Just to be sure everything was OK, I transmitted (using a ferrite rod > Tx antenna!) a marker at 136170.000 Hz and to my surprise, it showed > up on your version about half a Hz low! I had not entered a close > estimate for the 48000 sampling rate and apparently SL locked onto > something else? Actually i disabled the sampling rate detector and so it doesn't lock to anything. It must be due to a different offset. > I measured the actual sample rate at 48000.10944, entered that and > thereafter the displayed line jumped right up to 136.170 Khz. My usr > uses 22050 (which is actually 22200.0653), but I had already typed > that in last night. Ah right, that's the reason of course. And of course i cannot know your soundcards offset at that sample rate and prepare the file ;-) > I'm not sure how Windows XP handles things when two applications are > inputting simultaneously using different sample rates. My LF and VLF grabbers ( 2 PCs) run XP. The 8970 Hz files use 24 kS/s, RSDN-20 uses 30 kS/s and wideband uses 48 kS/s without any problems :-) > I am using V2.77 b02 of Spectrum Lab for this test. Oh, 2.77 b02. There is already a b2 version? :-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC > 73, > Bill VE2IQ > > At 01:53 PM 9/7/2011, Stefan wrote: >> Thanks Bill ;-) The webpage looks fine! :-) >> >> At G4WGT i can see Mal TXing nearly 136.172. Will he join in? Oh, it >> seems i really have to finish that PA supply ;-) >> Looking forward to that evening! Unfortunately there will be some >> rain it seems. That may cost a dB or so... >