Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-de03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 2236A380002F5; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 08:38:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1R1HNW-0005Wh-1I for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 13:37:18 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1R1HNS-0005TK-2B for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 13:37:14 +0100 Received: from relay2.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.210.211]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1R1HNO-0006jg-5a for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 13:37:13 +0100 Received: from freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.29.204]) by relay2.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p87Cb83m032210 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 14:37:08 +0200 Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.22.206]) by freitag.iup.uni-heidelberg.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.11.2) with ESMTP id p87Cb8tk021102 for ; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 14:37:08 +0200 Message-ID: <4E676569.5030207@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 14:36:57 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4E6695F9.8060402@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4E6727E8.5040508@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: beaconing to the west II ...and to the east, north and south... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:479280256:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40cb4e6765b713cb X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hello Bill, This looks very promising to me, although ID is still insecure. 21 mHz is a good choice but you should have enabled "one pixel per FFT bin" in the 1st register card of the spectrum display settings. Furthermore the spectrogram should scroll a bit slower, about 10 seconds per pixel is best i find. Which noise reduction setting did you choose? Any band limiting and noise blanking? All in all i would say that this is my trace since time and frequency matches. But we should repeat this once again for beeing sure :-) Looking forward to that! I will TX this night again, unless the rain isn't to strong (have replaced that stone pot above the coil since it causes to many losses...). Thanks for watching! Very interesting :-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 07.09.2011 14:23, schrieb Bill de Carle: > At 04:14 AM 9/7/2011, Stefan wrote: >> Hello Bill, >> >> Fine :-) Can we have a capture showing the trace? What was the time >> of the detection? >> >> 73, Stefan >> >> Am 07.09.2011 03:23, schrieb Bill de Carle: >>> Grabber is on tonight in Ontario Canada. If I stand far back and >>> squint I'd say there was a trace (not decodable) on his frequency :-) > > I should have included a link to the capture. Freq is right but maybe > it was some other signal? FFT was 21 mHz per bin and the trace > occurred at approx 0055 .. 0110 - Here it is: > > http://www.nrtco.net/~ve2iq/grabs/capt15.jpg > > Bill VE2IQ >