Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mh02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id D0BA238000089; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 17:48:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1R0KXK-0006Oa-J1 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 22:47:30 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1R0KXK-0006OR-2N for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 22:47:30 +0100 Received: from relay.uni-heidelberg.de ([129.206.100.212]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1R0KXI-0006sH-HW for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2011 22:47:30 +0100 Received: from ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (cyrus-portal.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.176]) by relay.uni-heidelberg.de (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p84LlRkE024888 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 23:47:27 +0200 Received: from extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.100.140]) by ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p84LlQ42003257 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 23:47:26 +0200 Received: from [129.206.205.144] (vpn205-144.rzuser.uni-heidelberg.de [129.206.205.144]) by extmail.urz.uni-heidelberg.de (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id p84LlPgx022199 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 23:47:26 +0200 Message-ID: <4E63F1ED.4090006@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 23:47:25 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Sch=E4fer?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100711 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,RATWARE_GECKO_BUILD=1.426 Subject: Re: LF: Re: 137.7679kHz QRSS30 beacon - reports please Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------040009090508010202040104" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNSAFE,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:502687456:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60d64e63f2247bdd X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------040009090508010202040104 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit That's one big advantage of QRPp: It's much easier to incease to 6 dB more power :-) Good luck Roger, 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 02.09.2011 21:37, schrieb Roger Lapthorn: > Thanks for the reports, both positive and negative, of my QRPp QRSS30 > signal last night. There will be no tests now for a while as we have > our grandson staying, but the next time the signal appears it should > be at least 6dB stronger. > > 73s > Roger G3XBM > > > > On 1 September 2011 18:04, Roger Lapthorn > wrote: > > The ERP of my QRSS30 LF beacon on 137.7679kHz has been increased > to around 150uW. This is about 5-6dB more than the last time I ran > it. > > It will run from 1700z Thursday to 0800z Friday and I'd appreciate > any reports from near and far. > > The beacon sends "XBM"in QRSS30 with the full call at 10wpm > periodically for full ID. > > 73s > Roger G3XBM > > -- > http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ > http://www.g3xbm.co.uk > http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm > https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/ > > > > > -- > http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ > http://www.g3xbm.co.uk > http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm > https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/ > --------------040009090508010202040104 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit That's one big advantage of QRPp: It's much easier to incease to 6 dB more power :-)

Good luck Roger,

73, Stefan/DK7FC

Am 02.09.2011 21:37, schrieb Roger Lapthorn:
Thanks for the reports, both positive and negative, of my QRPp QRSS30 signal last night. There will be no tests now for a while as we have our grandson staying, but the next time the signal appears it should be at least 6dB stronger.

73s
Roger G3XBM



On 1 September 2011 18:04, Roger Lapthorn <rogerlapthorn@gmail.com> wrote:
The ERP of my QRSS30 LF beacon on 137.7679kHz has been increased to around 150uW. This is about 5-6dB more than the last time I ran it.

It will run from 1700z Thursday to 0800z Friday and I'd appreciate
any reports from near and far.

The beacon sends "XBM"in QRSS30 with the full call at 10wpm periodically for full ID.

73s
Roger G3XBM

--
http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm
https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/




--
http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm
https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/

--------------040009090508010202040104--