Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-db03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 0E0F338000115; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 14:34:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1QzYYK-0006LQ-Ii for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 19:33:20 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1QzYYK-0006LH-3U for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 19:33:20 +0100 Received: from out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.241]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QzYYI-0005fQ-JC for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 19:33:20 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ar8AADohYU5Ok8gX/2dsb2JhbABClF8DhBGEYYsSeYFBBQEBBQgBAQNJAiwBAQMFAgEDEQQBAQolFAEEGgYWCAYTCgECAgEBh2O5BYZlBIJUhGadAA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,320,1312153200"; d="scan'208,217";a="353271487" Received: from host-78-147-200-23.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([78.147.200.23]) by out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 02 Sep 2011 19:33:11 +0100 Message-ID: <009e01cc699e$c53c14a0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <001201cc6943$47f18e40$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf><4E608A57.7080400@telus.net><008e01cc6994$8c75fa00$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 19:33:11 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR=0.276 Subject: Re: LF: ROS Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_009B_01CC69A7.26C74430" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:447046016:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40574e6121aa5ab4 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_009B_01CC69A7.26C74430 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I understand, but I was not. Considering the volume of signals visible = at my QTH, but I did copy one complete line from the GM station, who was = probably the weakest, also as pointed out I kept getting via the = internet other freqs and acty that I did not want. The prog also crashed 3 times, not the PC. It does not look attractive. = I was able to see all the signals active on the waterfall and had it = been qrs 3 I could have copied all of the information instead of waiting = and waiting and nothing happened Others are are also critical about this mode on LF es MF Why did I copy one station and not the others especially the strong ones = ? mal/g3kev ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Gary - G4WGT=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 7:20 PM Subject: Re: LF: ROS Mal, Did you mis-understand ? I was getting 100% decodes from Finbar & John even though there was no = audible or visual signal. Cheers, Gary - G4WGT. On 2 September 2011 18:20, mal hamilton wrote: You have just verified what I have always said. Yes keep an open mind and experiment but in the end all will come to = the same conclusion as Yourself.=20 QRSS/DFCW. Over the years I have had a multitude of private emails saying the = same thing. We are not alone !! de g3kev ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Scott Tilley=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 8:48 AM Subject: Re: LF: ROS On 9/2/2011 12:38 AM, mal hamilton wrote:=20 While it is interesting to experiment with different modes Mal is this really you? I agree with you on the QRSS/DFCW comment! ------=_NextPart_000_009B_01CC69A7.26C74430 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I understand, but I was = not.  Considering the=20 volume of signals visible at my QTH, but I did copy one complete = line from=20 the GM station, who was probably the weakest, also as pointed out I kept = getting=20 via the internet other freqs and acty that I did not want.
The prog also crashed 3 times, not the PC. It = does not=20 look attractive. I was able to see all the signals active on the = waterfall and=20 had it been qrs 3 I could have copied all of the information instead of = waiting=20 and waiting and nothing happened
Others are are also critical about this mode on = LF es=20 MF
Why did I copy one station and not the others = especially=20 the strong ones ?
mal/g3kev
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Gary -=20 G4WGT
Sent: Friday, September 02, = 2011 7:20=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: ROS

Mal,

Did you mis-understand ?

I was getting 100% decodes from Finbar & John even though = there was=20 no audible or visual signal.

Cheers, Gary - G4WGT.


On 2 September 2011 18:20, mal hamilton <g3kevmal@talktalk.net>=20 wrote:
You have just verified what I have always=20 said.
Yes keep an open mind and experiment but in = the end=20 all will come to the same conclusion as Yourself.
QRSS/DFCW.
Over the years I have had a multitude of = private=20 emails saying the same thing. We are not alone !!
de g3kev
 
----- Original Message ----- =
From: = Scott Tilley
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sent: Friday, September 02, = 2011 8:48=20 AM
Subject: Re: LF: ROS

On 9/2/2011 12:38 AM, mal hamilton wrote:=20
While it is = interesting to=20 experiment with different modes
Mal is = this=20 really you?

I agree with you on the QRSS/DFCW=20 = comment!



------=_NextPart_000_009B_01CC69A7.26C74430--