Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-df06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 76A73380000AD; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 20:10:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1QzdnH-00066U-71 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 01:09:07 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1QzdnG-00066L-NM for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 01:09:06 +0100 Received: from out1.ip09ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.245]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1QzdnD-0001Dk-3L for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2011 01:09:06 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArYAAMFvYU5Ok8RF/2dsb2JhbABCmHWEYYsSeYE/AgUBAQUIAQEDSQIsAQEDBQIBAxEEAQEKJRQBBBoGFggGEwoBAgIBAYdjArd+hmUEglSEZp0A X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,321,1312153200"; d="scan'208,217";a="489149357" Received: from host-78-147-196-69.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([78.147.196.69]) by out1.ip09ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 03 Sep 2011 01:08:56 +0100 Message-ID: <001701cc69cd$ac734770$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <001201cc6943$47f18e40$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <4E608A57.7080400@telus.net> <008e01cc6994$8c75fa00$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <4E616B56.1030300@telus.net> Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2011 01:08:56 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR=0.276 Subject: Re: LF: ROS Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0014_01CC69D6.0DF50120" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:445206080:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40da4e61705d7310 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0014_01CC69D6.0DF50120 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Scott I will give it some thought. I have worked VE7 es W6/W7 es KL7 stations = on 160metres CW over the years during the winter months. so like you say it is likely that it can be done on 500 and possibly = 137. If someone else beats me to the post so be it !!=20 On 160 metres the optimum time was coming up to my sunrise. I have also = worked on CW ZL es KH6 plus others in the past. My 160 antenna is 3/8 wave inv L up over 100 ft vertical and my 600 = metre antenna is 1/4 wave at the same height. 73 de mal/g3kev =20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Scott Tilley=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2011 12:48 AM Subject: Re: LF: ROS Mal when are you planning to test the path from G3 to VE7? Surely = you're not going to allow someone else to do it first :-) We await the viability of the path to be demonstrated at amateur power = levels. =20 As DCF39 becomes VERY audible at times (typically best in Nov) it is = possible that an amateur QRSS/DFCW signal could make it over here... GL Scott VE7TIL CN89dk http://www3.telus.net/sthed/argo/ On 9/2/2011 10:20 AM, mal hamilton wrote:=20 You have just verified what I have always said. Yes keep an open mind and experiment but in the end all will come to = the same conclusion as Yourself.=20 QRSS/DFCW. Over the years I have had a multitude of private emails saying the = same thing. We are not alone !! de g3kev ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Scott Tilley=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 8:48 AM Subject: Re: LF: ROS On 9/2/2011 12:38 AM, mal hamilton wrote:=20 While it is interesting to experiment with different modes Mal is this really you? I agree with you on the QRSS/DFCW comment! ------=_NextPart_000_0014_01CC69D6.0DF50120 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Scott
I will give it some thought. I have worked VE7 = es W6/W7 es=20 KL7 stations on 160metres CW over the years during the winter=20 months.
so like you say it is likely that it can be done = on 500=20 and possibly 137.
If someone else beats me to the post so be it !! =
On 160 metres the optimum time was coming up to = my=20 sunrise. I have also worked on CW  ZL es KH6 plus others in the=20 past.
My 160 antenna is 3/8 wave inv L up over 100 ft = vertical=20 and my 600 metre antenna is 1/4 wave at the same = height.
73 de mal/g3kev
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Scott = Tilley=20
Sent: Saturday, September 03, = 2011 12:48=20 AM
Subject: Re: LF: ROS

Mal when are you planning to test the path from G3 to=20 VE7?  Surely you're not going to allow someone else to do it = first=20 :-)

We await the viability of the path to be demonstrated at = amateur=20 power levels. 

As DCF39 becomes VERY audible at times = (typically=20 best in Nov) it is possible that an amateur QRSS/DFCW signal could = make it=20 over here...

GL
Scott
VE7TIL CN89dk
http://www3.telus.net/sthed/ar= go/


On=20 9/2/2011 10:20 AM, mal hamilton wrote:=20
You have just verified what I have always=20 said.
Yes keep an open mind and experiment but in = the end=20 all will come to the same conclusion as Yourself.
QRSS/DFCW.
Over the years I have had a multitude of = private=20 emails saying the same thing. We are not alone !!
de g3kev
 
----- Original Message ----- =
From:=20 Scott Tilley
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sent: Friday, September 02, = 2011 8:48=20 AM
Subject: Re: LF: ROS

On 9/2/2011 12:38 AM, mal hamilton wrote:=20
While it is interesting to = experiment with=20 different modes
Mal is this really = you?

I agree=20 with you on the QRSS/DFCW=20 comment!



------=_NextPart_000_0014_01CC69D6.0DF50120--