Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mh06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 6883B380000A5; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 08:20:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Qtf67-0008K0-Sq for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 13:19:51 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Qtf67-0008Jr-Ek for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 13:19:51 +0100 Received: from smtp-vbr12.xs4all.nl ([194.109.24.32]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Qtf65-0004In-Fp for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 13:19:51 +0100 Received: from pc-roelof (ndb.demon.nl [82.161.81.65]) by smtp-vbr12.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p7HCJhmJ035639 for ; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 14:19:48 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from roelof@ndb.demon.nl) To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <28750.73141.qm@web100013.mail.kks.yahoo.co.jp> Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 14:19:38 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Roelof Bakker" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <28750.73141.qm@web100013.mail.kks.yahoo.co.jp> User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.50 (Win32) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes Subject: Re: Re:Re: LF: DCF39 in JA Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:421765280:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60da4e4bb22503d2 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hello Yas, I have looked at your nice drawings. Mini-whip no 1 is much more in the clear than no 2. No 2 is close to the tall building next doors. It is not only height that makes the difference, but also the screening from nearby buildings, trees etc. So, it might be interesting to relocate no 2 close to no 1! If at all possible, you could even try to mount it away from the building on a horizontal mast. 73, Roelof Bakker, pa0rdt