Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25])
	by mtain-dd02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id E7C7F38000090;
	Wed, 24 Aug 2011 11:43:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1QwFb6-0005ij-0I
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:42:32 +0100
Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1QwFb5-0005ia-Kr
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:42:31 +0100
Received: from mail-yw0-f43.google.com ([209.85.213.43])
	by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <rogerlapthorn@gmail.com>)
	id 1QwFb2-0002Mp-EV
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:42:31 +0100
Received: by ywm3 with SMTP id 3so1305043ywm.16
        for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 08:42:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=8BR/E9pSobei69UtBVSFkUhCD4ldGgh371P5BX5VBpQ=;
        b=tZX5eiDmC3p8MpXzPMk18k3AlgwVGjTK9J3VRUoHpV2NmpRNPqL2JG+c/Xh8aRuhFE
         35HhzFnLK3zrxQjafX63N/Oc1l4QT4S+UXymOgZTJHp5aumEtWu1ztQ0sVrSbtG/MVOL
         lIk1TSoTO64aXHsqdxEWAL4Yq5wyD9PGehnt4=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.142.142.20 with SMTP id p20mr424175wfd.439.1314200541743; Wed,
 24 Aug 2011 08:42:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.142.188.7 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 08:42:21 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:42:21 +0100
Message-ID: <CAHAQVWOwLaz104cZGhvbLr23zt+03-J2yMBTVm+Cep-rKFTmvw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roger Lapthorn <rogerlapthorn@gmail.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001
Subject: LF: WSPR or QRSS: which is better?
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd32fd474495504ab4228eb
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
x-aol-global-disposition: G
X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:377393184:93952408  
X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0  
X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d018.1 ; domain : gmail.com DKIM : fail  
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d408e4e551c3c5710
X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25
X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none


--000e0cd32fd474495504ab4228eb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

A question for the coding experts here: WSPR is an excellent weak signal
beaconing mode, but at what QRSS speed is QRSS "better" ?

73s
Roger G3XBM

-- 
http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
http://www.g3xbm.co.uk
http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm
https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/

--000e0cd32fd474495504ab4228eb
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

A question for the coding experts here: WSPR is an excellent weak signal be=
aconing mode, but at what QRSS speed is QRSS &quot;better&quot; ?<br><br>73=
s<br>Roger G3XBM<br clear=3D"all"><br>-- <br><a href=3D"http://g3xbm-qrp.bl=
ogspot.com/" target=3D"_blank">http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/</a><br>
<a href=3D"http://www.g3xbm.co.uk" target=3D"_blank">http://www.g3xbm.co.uk=
</a><br><a href=3D"http://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm" target=3D"_blank">htt=
p://www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm</a><br><a href=3D"https://sites.google.com/s=
ite/sub9khz/" target=3D"_blank">https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/</a><=
br>
<br>

--000e0cd32fd474495504ab4228eb--